Experience of Poverty
|
Experience of Poverty |
||
|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Data | 2026 Grade |
|
People Feeling Worse off Compared to Last Year
This grade is based on the percentage of respondents who indicated they are financially worse-off compared to one year prior. The grade was given a weight of 25/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
INC | INC |
|
People Feeling Worse off Compared to Last Year
This grade is based on the percentage of respondents who indicated they are financially worse-off compared to one year prior. The grade was given a weight of 25/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:INC |
||
2026 GradeINC |
||
|
People Paying More than 30% of Income on Housing
This grade is based on the percentage of respondents who indicated they are spending 30% or more of their income on housing. The grade was given a weight of 25/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
INC | INC |
|
People Paying More than 30% of Income on Housing
This grade is based on the percentage of respondents who indicated they are spending 30% or more of their income on housing. The grade was given a weight of 25/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:INC |
||
2026 GradeINC |
||
|
People Having Trouble Accessing Healthcare
This grade is based on the percentage of respondents who indicated they 'somewhat disagree’ or ‘strongly disagree’ with the statement ‘I can access and receive healthcare anytime I need to’ AND stated the reason was due to one or more of the following reasons: ‘I can't take time off work’; ‘I don’t have healthcare coverage’; ‘I don’t have money for medication’. The grade was given a weight of 10/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
INC | INC |
|
People Having Trouble Accessing Healthcare
This grade is based on the percentage of respondents who indicated they 'somewhat disagree’ or ‘strongly disagree’ with the statement ‘I can access and receive healthcare anytime I need to’ AND stated the reason was due to one or more of the following reasons: ‘I can't take time off work’; ‘I don’t have healthcare coverage’; ‘I don’t have money for medication’. The grade was given a weight of 10/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:INC |
||
2026 GradeINC |
||
|
Government Support Recipients Who Say Rates are Insufficient to Keep up with Cost of Living
This grade is based on the percentage of individuals who indicated that they ‘personally receive some form of social security benefit or support’ AND indicated that social assistance rates aren’t high enough to help me keep up with the cost of living’. The grade was given a weight of 25/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
INC | INC |
|
Government Support Recipients Who Say Rates are Insufficient to Keep up with Cost of Living
This grade is based on the percentage of individuals who indicated that they ‘personally receive some form of social security benefit or support’ AND indicated that social assistance rates aren’t high enough to help me keep up with the cost of living’. The grade was given a weight of 25/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:INC |
||
2026 GradeINC |
||
|
Percent of Income Spent on Fixed Costs beyond Housing
This grade is based on the combination of results from several questions asking the average amount individuals spend on fixed costs like internet, transport, groceries, and utilities. The average amounts spent were converted into a portion of income for those earning $75,000 a year or less (given in a range from lowest to highest). This number is the higher end of the range provided. The grade was given a weight of 15/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
INC | INC |
|
Percent of Income Spent on Fixed Costs beyond Housing
This grade is based on the combination of results from several questions asking the average amount individuals spend on fixed costs like internet, transport, groceries, and utilities. The average amounts spent were converted into a portion of income for those earning $75,000 a year or less (given in a range from lowest to highest). This number is the higher end of the range provided. The grade was given a weight of 15/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:INC |
||
2026 GradeINC |
||
Overall Grade INC |
||
Overall Grade: INC |
||
Last year, Food Banks Canada was unable to confidently assign the territories a grade because of limited sample sizes. Results across the territories were consolidated, which meant we could not accurately address each territory individually.
Data collection for the purpose of poverty reduction efforts in the north requires an approach that is unique, culturally sensitive, and tailored to the experiences of Indigenous peoples. Food Banks Canada continues to endeavour to find innovative ways to collect data that can drive effective policy solutions while respecting the diverse cultural and historical perspectives of northern communities.
In an effort to improve the quality of our data in 2026, we expanded our polling in the North through the addition of phone-based surveys and achieved a larger sample size. While this larger sample size allows for a higher degree of confidence in our analyses, the results still may not accurately represent the circumstances of all communities in the North for a variety of reasons:
- Many residents in the territories live in small communities that are spread out across a vast geographical area. Community experiences vary substantially, which means that statisticians must survey a much larger proportion of the population to achieve a representative sample.
- Many First Nations people have expressed distrust of government data collection because of historical and ongoing injustices, and therefore may be less likely to respond to polling. It is possible that these feelings of distrust are also held more broadly by Indigenous Peoples, who make up a large portion of the population of the territories.
- The territories have the lowest rate of high-speed internet access in the country, and in remote communities, that rate is even lower.
It is therefore very likely that those who are most vulnerable to poverty, including Indigenous people and isolated communities, were unable to respond to our survey.
Last year, Food Banks Canada was unable to confidently assign the territories a grade because of limited sample sizes. Results across the territories were consolidated, which meant we could not accurately address each territory individually.
Data collection for the purpose of poverty reduction efforts in the north requires an approach that is unique, culturally sensitive, and tailored to the experiences of Indigenous peoples. Food Banks Canada continues to endeavour to find innovative ways to collect data that can drive effective policy solutions while respecting the diverse cultural and historical perspectives of northern communities.
In an effort to improve the quality of our data in 2026, we expanded our polling in the North through the addition of phone-based surveys and achieved a larger sample size. While this larger sample size allows for a higher degree of confidence in our analyses, the results still may not accurately represent the circumstances of all communities in the North for a variety of reasons:
- Many residents in the territories live in small communities that are spread out across a vast geographical area. Community experiences vary substantially, which means that statisticians must survey a much larger proportion of the population to achieve a representative sample.
- Many First Nations people have expressed distrust of government data collection because of historical and ongoing injustices, and therefore may be less likely to respond to polling. It is possible that these feelings of distrust are also held more broadly by Indigenous Peoples, who make up a large portion of the population of the territories.
- The territories have the lowest rate of high-speed internet access in the country, and in remote communities, that rate is even lower.
It is therefore very likely that those who are most vulnerable to poverty, including Indigenous people and isolated communities, were unable to respond to our survey.
Poverty Measures
|
Poverty Measures |
||
|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Data | 2026 Grade |
|
Poverty Rate (MBM)
The poverty rate (MBM) is based on data from the Statistics Canada 2024 Canadian Income Survey (released in 2026) table showing poverty and low income statistics by selected demographic characteristics. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 40/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
11.8% | F |
|
Poverty Rate (MBM)
The poverty rate (MBM) is based on data from the Statistics Canada 2024 Canadian Income Survey (released in 2026) table showing poverty and low income statistics by selected demographic characteristics. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 40/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:11.8% |
||
2026 GradeF |
||
|
Provincial Welfare as a Percent of the Poverty Line (Singles)
This grade is based on the maximum annual provincial welfare income for a single unattached individual considered employable compared to the official poverty line of the provincial capital (the Market Basket Measure). The data is from Welfare in Canada 2025, available on Maytree’s website. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 15/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
70.6% | B |
|
Provincial Welfare as a Percent of the Poverty Line (Singles)
This grade is based on the maximum annual provincial welfare income for a single unattached individual considered employable compared to the official poverty line of the provincial capital (the Market Basket Measure). The data is from Welfare in Canada 2025, available on Maytree’s website. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 15/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:70.6% |
||
2026 GradeB |
||
|
Provincial Disability Welfare as a Percent of the Poverty Line
This grade is based on the maximum annual provincial welfare income for a single unattached individual with a disability compared to the official poverty line of the provincial capital (the Market Basket Measure). The data is from Welfare in Canada 2025, available on Maytree’s website. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 15/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
81.9% | B+ |
|
Provincial Disability Welfare as a Percent of the Poverty Line
This grade is based on the maximum annual provincial welfare income for a single unattached individual with a disability compared to the official poverty line of the provincial capital (the Market Basket Measure). The data is from Welfare in Canada 2025, available on Maytree’s website. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 15/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:81.9% |
||
2026 GradeB+ |
||
|
Unemployment Rate
This grade is based on Statistics Canada’s Labour force characteristics by province, monthly adjusted. This data is from March 2026. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 20/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
3.9% | C+ |
|
Unemployment Rate
This grade is based on Statistics Canada’s Labour force characteristics by province, monthly adjusted. This data is from March 2026. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 20/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:3.9% |
||
2026 GradeC+ |
||
|
Food Insecurity Rate
This grade is based on the combination of Marginal, Moderate, and Severe food insecurity rates for all persons in 2022 from the Statistics Canada’s Canadian Income Survey (CIS) (2024). The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 40/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
15.5% | B |
|
Food Insecurity Rate
This grade is based on the combination of Marginal, Moderate, and Severe food insecurity rates for all persons in 2022 from the Statistics Canada’s Canadian Income Survey (CIS) (2024). The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 40/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:15.5% |
||
2026 GradeB |
||
Overall Grade INC |
||
Overall Grade: INC |
||
The Yukon received an overall grade of C in the poverty measures section, tied with Quebec for the highest grade among all jurisdictions. While this represents a comparatively strong performance, a C grade reflects significant room for improvement across all indicators.
- Poverty rate: The most recent available data (from 2024) show the poverty rate in the Yukon is 11.8%, above the national average of 11.1%. Quebec reports the lowest poverty rate among provinces at 7%.
- Social assistance as a percentage of the poverty line: In the Yukon, social assistance provides 70.6% of the income needed to reach the poverty line, the second strongest performance among all jurisdictions behind the Northwest Territories. Despite leading the country, benefits fall well short of the poverty line. Prince Edward Island performs strongest on this measure among the provinces, with benefits covering 64.4% of the poverty line.
- Disability assistance as a percentage of the poverty line: Disability assistance in the Yukon reaches 81.9% of the poverty line. Despite this strong performance, benefits fall short of what is needed to reach the poverty line. The Northwest Territories leads this indicator at 92.5%.
- Unemployment rate: The Yukon's unemployment rate is 3.9%, the lowest among all jurisdictions nationally, making it the strongest performer on this indicator. Saskatchewan has the lowest rate among provinces at 5%.
- Food insecurity: The most recent available data (from 2025) show that 15.5% of people in the Yukon live in households experiencing food insecurity, the lowest rate among all jurisdictions and well below the national average of 24%. Quebec reports the lowest rate among provinces, where approximately 1 in 5 people experience food insecurity.
The Yukon received an overall grade of C in the poverty measures section, tied with Quebec for the highest grade among all jurisdictions. While this represents a comparatively strong performance, a C grade reflects significant room for improvement across all indicators.
- Poverty rate: The most recent available data (from 2024) show the poverty rate in the Yukon is 11.8%, above the national average of 11.1%. Quebec reports the lowest poverty rate among provinces at 7%.
- Social assistance as a percentage of the poverty line: In the Yukon, social assistance provides 70.6% of the income needed to reach the poverty line, the second strongest performance among all jurisdictions behind the Northwest Territories. Despite leading the country, benefits fall well short of the poverty line. Prince Edward Island performs strongest on this measure among the provinces, with benefits covering 64.4% of the poverty line.
- Disability assistance as a percentage of the poverty line: Disability assistance in the Yukon reaches 81.9% of the poverty line. Despite this strong performance, benefits fall short of what is needed to reach the poverty line. The Northwest Territories leads this indicator at 92.5%.
- Unemployment rate: The Yukon's unemployment rate is 3.9%, the lowest among all jurisdictions nationally, making it the strongest performer on this indicator. Saskatchewan has the lowest rate among provinces at 5%.
- Food insecurity: The most recent available data (from 2025) show that 15.5% of people in the Yukon live in households experiencing food insecurity, the lowest rate among all jurisdictions and well below the national average of 24%. Quebec reports the lowest rate among provinces, where approximately 1 in 5 people experience food insecurity.
Material Deprivation
|
Material Deprivation |
||
|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Data | 2026 Grade |
|
Inadequate Standard of Living
This grade is based on the % of individuals who were unable to afford 2 or more items from a list of items considered necessary for an adequate standard of living. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 40/100. Grades were determined using a grading scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
INC | INC |
|
Inadequate Standard of Living
This grade is based on the % of individuals who were unable to afford 2 or more items from a list of items considered necessary for an adequate standard of living. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 40/100. Grades were determined using a grading scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:INC |
||
2026 GradeINC |
||
|
Severely Inadequate Standard of Living
This grade is based on the % of individuals who were unable to afford 3 or more items from a list of items considered necessary for an adequate standard of living. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 60/100. Grades were determined using a grading scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
INC | INC |
|
Severely Inadequate Standard of Living
This grade is based on the % of individuals who were unable to afford 3 or more items from a list of items considered necessary for an adequate standard of living. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 60/100. Grades were determined using a grading scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:INC |
||
2026 GradeINC |
||
Overall Grade INC |
||
Overall Grade: INC |
||
See the section 1 context description. As the Material Deprivation Index is sourced from the same survey as section 1 results, we cannot reliably comment on the data as it may not reflect the real-life circumstances of many people living in the region.
See the section 1 context description. As the Material Deprivation Index is sourced from the same survey as section 1 results, we cannot reliably comment on the data as it may not reflect the real-life circumstances of many people living in the region.
Legislative Progress
|
Legislative Progress |
||
|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Data | 2026 Grade |
|
Legislative Progress
|
D |
|
|
Legislative Progress
|
||
Data: |
||
2026 GradeD |
||
Overall Grade D |
||
Overall Grade: D |
||
Housing and Affordability
- Invested $13 million in an expanded Affordability Rate Relief program to offset electricity cost increases.
- Opened intake for the Housing Initiatives Fund, offering up to $100,000 per unit (maximum 10 units) to support new affordable rental construction, with affordability and energy efficiency requirements.
- Set the 2026 rent index at 2.6%, marking the final year of the rent cap, with plans to phase out rent control.
Fiscal and Economic Measures
- Launched a fiscal recovery plan that included committing to limiting spending growth and reviewing government programs and transfers.
- Tabled a $2.46 billion budget with an $81.8 million deficit, constrained by the federally imposed $1.2 billion debt cap.
Yukon received a D for legislative progress this year. The expanded Affordability Rate Relief program, totalling $15.6 million, is a substantive response to the three-year 34% increase in electricity rates and provides meaningful protection for households with low incomes. The Housing Initiatives Fund also reflects sound policy design, with 20-year affordability requirements and strong energy efficiency standards, although its scale — capped at 10 units per project — remains modest relative to Yukon’s housing shortage.
However, several factors limit progress. The Government’s plan to phase out rent control following the final 2.6% cap in 2026 risks accelerating rent increases and displacing tenants with low incomes, including many Yukon First Nations residents. The absence of publicly available data on social assistance, housing investments, and childcare spending makes it impossible to assess whether supports have been maintained or strengthened. Taken together, recent actions reflect some targeted relief, but broader progress remains limited.
Housing and Affordability
- Invested $13 million in an expanded Affordability Rate Relief program to offset electricity cost increases.
- Opened intake for the Housing Initiatives Fund, offering up to $100,000 per unit (maximum 10 units) to support new affordable rental construction, with affordability and energy efficiency requirements.
- Set the 2026 rent index at 2.6%, marking the final year of the rent cap, with plans to phase out rent control.
Fiscal and Economic Measures
- Launched a fiscal recovery plan that included committing to limiting spending growth and reviewing government programs and transfers.
- Tabled a $2.46 billion budget with an $81.8 million deficit, constrained by the federally imposed $1.2 billion debt cap.
Yukon received a D for legislative progress this year. The expanded Affordability Rate Relief program, totalling $15.6 million, is a substantive response to the three-year 34% increase in electricity rates and provides meaningful protection for households with low incomes. The Housing Initiatives Fund also reflects sound policy design, with 20-year affordability requirements and strong energy efficiency standards, although its scale — capped at 10 units per project — remains modest relative to Yukon’s housing shortage.
However, several factors limit progress. The Government’s plan to phase out rent control following the final 2.6% cap in 2026 risks accelerating rent increases and displacing tenants with low incomes, including many Yukon First Nations residents. The absence of publicly available data on social assistance, housing investments, and childcare spending makes it impossible to assess whether supports have been maintained or strengthened. Taken together, recent actions reflect some targeted relief, but broader progress remains limited.
Political And Policy Landscape
Yukon entered 2026 under new political management. A territorial general election held on November 3, 2025, returned the Yukon Party to government for the first time since 2016, with leader Currie Dixon — the first Yukon-born premier — winning 51.9% of the popular vote, giving them a majority. The NDP, led by Kate White, forms the Official Opposition, and the incumbent Liberal Party collapsed to a single seat. Dixon’s first Speech from the Throne focused on scrapping several Liberal initiatives — including the rent cap — re-examining the territory’s health authority transition, and advancing private sector growth.
The Yukon Party’s Budget 2026/27 projects total spending of $2.46 billion and a record $81.8 million deficit, with net debt reaching $804.2 million, which comes perilously close to the federally imposed borrowing cap of $1.2 billion. Dixon characterized the fiscal situation as significantly worse than the Liberals publicly disclosed. The government is framing fiscal restraint as a priority, although it has committed to core investments in health care, energy grid affordability, housing supply, and public safety. A new $100 million voted contingency fund has been created. No new taxes were introduced.
Yukon does not have a functioning poverty reduction strategy. The Social Inclusion and Poverty Reduction Strategy Better Yukon for All, introduced in 2012, was never fully implemented and has no legislated targets, no official annual reporting mechanism, and no formal accountability structure. The 2020 Putting People First report provided a comprehensive review of health and social services, but implementation of the report’s recommendations has been partial. The new government has not committed to updating or replacing the existing strategy. It does not address poverty reduction as an explicit policy priority in its throne speech, budget framing, or mandate letters.
According to the Yukon Anti-Poverty Coalition (YAPC) Yukon Poverty Report Card 2025, approximately 1 in 10 (9.9%) residents were living below the poverty line in 2023. This is the lowest rate among the territories. However, there are deep disparities in Yukon, with communities outside Whitehorse experiencing much higher rates of poverty. Higher food and transportation costs, lower incomes, and government transfers that do not adjust for regional cost differences drive these disparities.
Food insecurity affects approximately 12.8% of Yukon households, based on 2021 data released in 2023. Rural communities face substantially higher food costs than Whitehorse communities, primarily because of higher transportation costs, but there has been no comprehensive territory-wide food cost monitoring since 2017. The Yukon Bureau of Statistics Community Spatial Index provides only a partial picture — it covers only about half the food items needed for a complete nutritious food basket assessment.
Yukon’s social assistance program provides a basic shelter allowance, utility coverage, and supplementary benefits. Despite this, three of four example household types tracked by Maytree remain below the poverty line. A single person living alone on social assistance had a total annual income of $23,281 in 2024 — approximately $8,960 below the poverty line. Social assistance rates are not indexed to inflation by legislation. The Yukon Carbon Price Rebate was identified as a meaningful income support for households with low or modest incomes, but it was eliminated in spring 2025.
Yukon’s minimum wage is indexed to the Whitehorse Consumer Price Index and increases annually. While the current rate of $18.51/hour is the second highest in Canada, the gap between the minimum wage and the basic cost of living continues to widen. The YAPC’s 2025 Living Wage Report estimates the living wage in Whitehorse at $31.22/hour for a single person, $25.91/hour per adult in a two-adult household with two children, and $33.95/hour for a single-parent household.
Housing affordability is the government’s most significant policy challenge. Average rents for all units in Whitehorse reached $1,711/month in April 2025 — a $500 increase since 2015 — while the vacancy rate has remained very low.
The government announced in February 2026 that 2026 will be the final year of the 2.6% rent cap introduced in 2021 by the previous government, with the rent index to be eliminated by 2027. The Yukon Party argues that rent control has failed to improve housing supply, but housing researchers caution that removing controls is directly associated with rent increases and increased evictions. The new Residential Tenancies Act, which came into force September 1, 2025, codifies no-cause eviction protections and other tenant rights passed under the previous government. The Yukon Party has not signalled any intent to reverse these protections.
On the federal–territorial front, Yukon signed several significant agreements in 2025:
- National School Food Program (2024–2027): Expands school food programming to all 33 Yukon schools and about 6,200 students.
- Pharmacare agreement: Commits up to $9.5 million over four years to provide universal, no‑cost access to contraceptive and diabetes supports.
- Early Learning and Child Care (ELCC) extension: Extends the Canada-Yukon ELCC Agreement to March 31, 2031, with approximately $74 million in funding to deliver $10/day average regulated childcare.
- Dental care: Yukon residents are eligible for the federal Canadian Dental Care Plan.
A persistent and structurally important weakness in Yukon’s poverty response is the absence of timely, disaggregated data. Community and demographic poverty data are available only every five years through the census. The most recent census data are from 2021 and were released in late 2023. Without disaggregated territorial data, program design and resource allocation cannot be precisely targeted.
The government’s emphasis on private sector growth and housing supply through market mechanisms may address medium-term affordability for working households but is unlikely to improve conditions for those experiencing the deepest levels of poverty without complementary income and non-market housing investments.
Policy Recommendations
Affordability
Reduce housing costs and maintain rental protections.
The new Yukon government should take steps to reduce the cost of both new housing construction and existing rental housing, while ensuring that current rental protections remain in place. This includes measures to expand supply, support affordability, and stabilize rents for households facing high shelter costs.
Advocate with the federal government to restore funding for the YFNED Rural Nutrition Program through a renewed Yukon–Canada partnership.
The Yukon Government should work with Indigenous Services Canada and YFNED to reinstate stable funding for the Rural Nutrition Program, which previously provided daily meals and snacks to students in 13 rural communities. Its suspension has removed a critical food source for nearly 900 children in remote Indigenous communities facing high food insecurity. The territory should actively support YFNED’s appeal and push for a long-term funding solution that treats school nutrition as essential infrastructure, not discretionary programming.
Reinstate and Expand Funding for School Food and Nutrition Programs in Partnership with Yukon First Nations and adopt local food policies that will reduce costs through procurement.
Working together, the territorial government and Indigenous Services Canada should a coordinated and shared vision to help improve local food costs. ISC should restore dedicated funding for the Rural Nutrition Program, recognizing its critical role in supporting the health, learning readiness, and cultural wellbeing of First Nations children in rural and remote Yukon communities. In parallel, the Government of Yukon should increase its financial commitment to school food programming. Funding should include a targeted stream for schools in rural, remote, and First Nations communities, where food insecurity rates are highest and logistical barriers to program delivery are greatest. Program design and governance should be developed in meaningful partnership with Yukon First Nations, school communities, and nutrition and public health experts, drawing on Indigenous knowledge and cultural food practices to ensure programs are locally relevant, sustainable, and dignified for the children and families they serve. The territory should also move forward with its platform commitment to leverage territorial procurement to support local food systems and address high food costs. This should include a dedicated stream that enables Indigenous traditional hunting and harvesting, allowing surplus game and food to be donated to food banks and community organizations.
Income Security
Index the Yukon Supplementary Allowance and increase support for people with disabilities.
Most components of Yukon’s social assistance system are indexed to inflation, but the Yukon Supplementary Allowance for recipients with disabilities is a notable exception. The government should begin indexing this allowance and provide an additional $50 per month to reflect recent increases in food and shelter prices, as well as persistent cost pressures in northern regions.
Labour Market Reform
Develop a Skills Development Fund in partnership with Yukon First Nations, labour unions, and employers.
The territory should establish a Skills Development Fund, modelled on Ontario’s program, to help Yukon workers build in‑demand skills and gain hands‑on experience. The fund should include a targeted stream for youth not in education, employment, or training (NEET), as well as for social assistance recipients, to strengthen pathways into stable employment.
Addressing Inequalities
Implement platform commitments to support local food and reduce high costs through procurement.
The government should act quickly to fulfill its commitment to leverage territorial procurement to support local food systems and address high food costs. This should include a dedicated stream that enables Indigenous traditional hunting and harvesting, allowing surplus game and food to be donated to food banks and community organizations.
Invest in Indigenous communities to enhance data collection and sovereignty for poverty measurement.
The Yukon government should provide resources to Indigenous communities to strengthen data collection, governance, and sovereignty. Enhanced data capacity is essential to accurately measure poverty rates in the territory and to develop targeted, community‑driven solutions.