Experience of Poverty
|
Experience of Poverty |
||
|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Data | 2026 Grade |
|
People Feeling Worse off Compared to Last Year
This grade is based on the percentage of respondents who indicated they are financially worse-off compared to one year prior. The grade was given a weight of 25/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
39% | C+ |
|
People Feeling Worse off Compared to Last Year
This grade is based on the percentage of respondents who indicated they are financially worse-off compared to one year prior. The grade was given a weight of 25/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:39% |
||
2026 GradeC+ |
||
|
People Paying More than 30% of Income on Housing
This grade is based on the percentage of respondents who indicated they are spending 30% or more of their income on housing. The grade was given a weight of 25/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
43% | F |
|
People Paying More than 30% of Income on Housing
This grade is based on the percentage of respondents who indicated they are spending 30% or more of their income on housing. The grade was given a weight of 25/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:43% |
||
2026 GradeF |
||
|
People Having Trouble Accessing Healthcare
This grade is based on the percentage of respondents who indicated they 'somewhat disagree’ or ‘strongly disagree’ with the statement ‘I can access and receive healthcare anytime I need to’ AND stated the reason was due to one or more of the following reasons: ‘I can't take time off work’; ‘I don’t have healthcare coverage’; ‘I don’t have money for medication’. The grade was given a weight of 10/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
36% | F |
|
People Having Trouble Accessing Healthcare
This grade is based on the percentage of respondents who indicated they 'somewhat disagree’ or ‘strongly disagree’ with the statement ‘I can access and receive healthcare anytime I need to’ AND stated the reason was due to one or more of the following reasons: ‘I can't take time off work’; ‘I don’t have healthcare coverage’; ‘I don’t have money for medication’. The grade was given a weight of 10/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:36% |
||
2026 GradeF |
||
|
Government Support Recipients Who Say Rates are Insufficient to Keep up with Cost of Living
This grade is based on the percentage of individuals who indicated that they ‘personally receive some form of social security benefit or support’ AND indicated that ‘social assistance rates aren’t high enough to help me keep up with the cost of living’. The grade was given a weight of 25/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
71% | F |
|
Government Support Recipients Who Say Rates are Insufficient to Keep up with Cost of Living
This grade is based on the percentage of individuals who indicated that they ‘personally receive some form of social security benefit or support’ AND indicated that ‘social assistance rates aren’t high enough to help me keep up with the cost of living’. The grade was given a weight of 25/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:71% |
||
2026 GradeF |
||
|
Percent of Income Spent on Fixed Costs beyond Housing
This grade is based on the combination of results from several questions asking the average amount individuals spend on fixed costs like internet, transport, groceries, and utilities. The average amounts spent were converted into a portion of income for those earning $75,000 a year or less (given in a range from lowest to highest). This number is the higher end of the range provided. The grade was given a weight of 15/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
56.5% | C- |
|
Percent of Income Spent on Fixed Costs beyond Housing
This grade is based on the combination of results from several questions asking the average amount individuals spend on fixed costs like internet, transport, groceries, and utilities. The average amounts spent were converted into a portion of income for those earning $75,000 a year or less (given in a range from lowest to highest). This number is the higher end of the range provided. The grade was given a weight of 15/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:56.5% |
||
2026 GradeC- |
||
Overall Grade D- |
||
Overall Grade: D- |
||
Ontario received a D− grade in 2026, reflecting widespread cost pressures and deteriorating access to care.
- Housing affordability: Ontario received a failing grade for this indicator, with 43% of people spending 30% or more of their income on housing. Ontario was previously tied with BC for having the most unaffordable housing, but housing stress - which peaked in 2024 – appears to have eased slightly since.
- Income spent on fixed costs outside of housing: Ontario earned a C− for this indicator, with 56.5% of people’s income going to fixed costs. This is higher than the national average and worse than both BC’s and Quebec’s figures for this indicator. Fixed costs remain persistently high.
- Access to health care: Ontario received an F, with 36% of people reporting difficulty in accessing health care. This makes Ontario the worst among the large provinces for this indicator. It follows two years of improvement for this indicator (16% in 2025 and 16.4% in 2024).
- Worse off than last year: 39% of people reported feeling worse off than they did last year— more than in Quebec but fewer than in BC. This marks a decline since 2024 and points to an easing of hardship.
- Adequacy of government support: Ontario received an F for this indicator, with 71% of people who receive support reporting that it is inadequate. This is the highest rate in the country, pointing systemic failure to address inadequate social assistance rates in the province.
Ontario received a D− grade in 2026, reflecting widespread cost pressures and deteriorating access to care.
- Housing affordability: Ontario received a failing grade for this indicator, with 43% of people spending 30% or more of their income on housing. Ontario was previously tied with BC for having the most unaffordable housing, but housing stress - which peaked in 2024 – appears to have eased slightly since.
- Income spent on fixed costs outside of housing: Ontario earned a C− for this indicator, with 56.5% of people’s income going to fixed costs. This is higher than the national average and worse than both BC’s and Quebec’s figures for this indicator. Fixed costs remain persistently high.
- Access to health care: Ontario received an F, with 36% of people reporting difficulty in accessing health care. This makes Ontario the worst among the large provinces for this indicator. It follows two years of improvement for this indicator (16% in 2025 and 16.4% in 2024).
- Worse off than last year: 39% of people reported feeling worse off than they did last year— more than in Quebec but fewer than in BC. This marks a decline since 2024 and points to an easing of hardship.
- Adequacy of government support: Ontario received an F for this indicator, with 71% of people who receive support reporting that it is inadequate. This is the highest rate in the country, pointing systemic failure to address inadequate social assistance rates in the province.
Poverty Measures
|
Poverty Measures |
||
|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Data | 2026 Grade |
|
Poverty Rate (MBM)
The poverty rate (MBM) is based on data from the Statistics Canada 2024 Canadian Income Survey (released in 2026) table showing poverty and low income statistics by selected demographic characteristics. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 40/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
12.5% | F |
|
Poverty Rate (MBM)
The poverty rate (MBM) is based on data from the Statistics Canada 2024 Canadian Income Survey (released in 2026) table showing poverty and low income statistics by selected demographic characteristics. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 40/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:12.5% |
||
2026 GradeF |
||
|
Provincial Welfare as a Percent of the Poverty Line (Singles)
This grade is based on the maximum annual provincial welfare income for a single unattached individual considered employable compared to the official poverty line of the provincial capital (the Market Basket Measure). The data is from Welfare in Canada 2025, available on Maytree’s website. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 15/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
32.7% | F |
|
Provincial Welfare as a Percent of the Poverty Line (Singles)
This grade is based on the maximum annual provincial welfare income for a single unattached individual considered employable compared to the official poverty line of the provincial capital (the Market Basket Measure). The data is from Welfare in Canada 2025, available on Maytree’s website. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 15/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:32.7% |
||
2026 GradeF |
||
|
Provincial Disability Welfare as a Percent of the Poverty Line
This grade is based on the maximum annual provincial welfare income for a single unattached individual with a disability compared to the official poverty line of the provincial capital (the Market Basket Measure). The data is from Welfare in Canada 2025, available on Maytree’s website. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 15/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
54.7% | D- |
|
Provincial Disability Welfare as a Percent of the Poverty Line
This grade is based on the maximum annual provincial welfare income for a single unattached individual with a disability compared to the official poverty line of the provincial capital (the Market Basket Measure). The data is from Welfare in Canada 2025, available on Maytree’s website. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 15/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:54.7% |
||
2026 GradeD- |
||
|
Unemployment Rate
This grade is based on Statistics Canada’s Labour force characteristics by province, monthly adjusted. This data is from March 2026. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 20/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
7.6% | F |
|
Unemployment Rate
This grade is based on Statistics Canada’s Labour force characteristics by province, monthly adjusted. This data is from March 2026. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 20/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:7.6% |
||
2026 GradeF |
||
|
Food Insecurity Rate
This grade is based on the combination of Marginal, Moderate, and Severe food insecurity rates from the Canadian Income Survey, 2024 (CIS) (released 2026). The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 40/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
25.4% | F |
|
Food Insecurity Rate
This grade is based on the combination of Marginal, Moderate, and Severe food insecurity rates from the Canadian Income Survey, 2024 (CIS) (released 2026). The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 40/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:25.4% |
||
2026 GradeF |
||
Overall Grade F |
||
Overall Grade: F |
||
Ontario received an overall grade of F in the poverty measures section. Quebec received the highest grade (C), while Ontario was among the weaker performers nationally alongside Alberta and New Brunswick.
- Poverty rate: The most recent available data (from 2024) show the poverty rate in Ontario is 12.5%, above the national average of 11.1%. Quebec reports the lowest poverty rate among provinces at 7%.
- Social assistance as a percentage of the poverty line: In Ontario, social assistance provides just 32.7% of the income needed to reach the poverty line, among the lowest in the country. Prince Edward Island performs strongest on this measure, with benefits covering 64.4% of the poverty line.
- Disability assistance as a percentage of the poverty line: Disability assistance in Ontario reaches 54.7% of the poverty line, falling well short of what is required. Newfoundland and Labrador leads this indicator at 74.1%.
- Unemployment rate: Ontario's unemployment rate is 7.6%, the highest among provinces and the weakest performance on this indicator nationally. Saskatchewan has the lowest provincial unemployment rate at 5%.
- Food insecurity: The most recent available data (from 2025) show that 25.4% of people in Ontario live in households experiencing food insecurity, above the national average of 24% and significantly higher than Quebec, where approximately 1 in 5 people experience food insecurity.
Ontario received an overall grade of F in the poverty measures section. Quebec received the highest grade (C), while Ontario was among the weaker performers nationally alongside Alberta and New Brunswick.
- Poverty rate: The most recent available data (from 2024) show the poverty rate in Ontario is 12.5%, above the national average of 11.1%. Quebec reports the lowest poverty rate among provinces at 7%.
- Social assistance as a percentage of the poverty line: In Ontario, social assistance provides just 32.7% of the income needed to reach the poverty line, among the lowest in the country. Prince Edward Island performs strongest on this measure, with benefits covering 64.4% of the poverty line.
- Disability assistance as a percentage of the poverty line: Disability assistance in Ontario reaches 54.7% of the poverty line, falling well short of what is required. Newfoundland and Labrador leads this indicator at 74.1%.
- Unemployment rate: Ontario's unemployment rate is 7.6%, the highest among provinces and the weakest performance on this indicator nationally. Saskatchewan has the lowest provincial unemployment rate at 5%.
- Food insecurity: The most recent available data (from 2025) show that 25.4% of people in Ontario live in households experiencing food insecurity, above the national average of 24% and significantly higher than Quebec, where approximately 1 in 5 people experience food insecurity.
Material Deprivation
|
Material Deprivation |
||
|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Data | 2026 Grade |
|
Inadequate Standard of Living
This grade is based on the % of individuals who were unable to afford 2 or more items from a list of items considered necessary for an adequate standard of living. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 40/100. Grades were determined using a grading scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
28% | B- |
|
Inadequate Standard of Living
This grade is based on the % of individuals who were unable to afford 2 or more items from a list of items considered necessary for an adequate standard of living. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 40/100. Grades were determined using a grading scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:28% |
||
2026 GradeB- |
||
|
Severely Inadequate Standard of Living
This grade is based on the % of individuals who were unable to afford 3 or more items from a list of items considered necessary for an adequate standard of living. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 60/100. Grades were determined using a grading scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
19% | B- |
|
Severely Inadequate Standard of Living
This grade is based on the % of individuals who were unable to afford 3 or more items from a list of items considered necessary for an adequate standard of living. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 60/100. Grades were determined using a grading scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:19% |
||
2026 GradeB- |
||
Overall Grade B- |
||
Overall Grade: B- |
||
Ontario received a B− grade for material deprivation in 2026, reflecting continued improvement.
This grade represents a gain from the province’s C+ in 2025 and aligns with the national upward trend.
In 2026, 19% of residents were severely deprived — a modest drop from 2024 but similar to 2025 — and 28% experienced inadequate living standards — unchanged from 2025. These minor changes suggest broader deprivation persists.
Ontario’s results indicate that improvements have primarily benefited people who face the greatest deprivation, while a larger group continues to struggle with affordability.
Overall, Ontario shows incomplete progress toward reducing material deprivation.
Ontario received a B− grade for material deprivation in 2026, reflecting continued improvement.
This grade represents a gain from the province’s C+ in 2025 and aligns with the national upward trend.
In 2026, 19% of residents were severely deprived — a modest drop from 2024 but similar to 2025 — and 28% experienced inadequate living standards — unchanged from 2025. These minor changes suggest broader deprivation persists.
Ontario’s results indicate that improvements have primarily benefited people who face the greatest deprivation, while a larger group continues to struggle with affordability.
Overall, Ontario shows incomplete progress toward reducing material deprivation.
Legislative Progress
|
Legislative Progress |
||
|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Data | 2026 Grade |
|
Legislative Progress
|
F |
|
|
Legislative Progress
|
||
Data: |
||
2026 GradeF |
||
Overall Grade F |
||
Overall Grade: F |
||
Housing and Affordability
- Budget 2026 commits $53 million over three years to expand supportive housing initiatives for vulnerable populations and enhance access to critical mental health services and housing supports.
- Budget 2026 invests $186 million in 2026-27 through the Ontario Autism Program, bringing spending from $779 million in 2025-26 to $965 million next year.
- The government announced an investment of $407 million over three years to help community organizations manage rising costs and maintain essential services, including for people with people with developmental disabilities.
- Launched public consultations to inform the next Poverty Reduction Strategy, ahead of the expiry of the 2020–2025 plan.
- Reduced the provincial gas tax by 5.7 cents per litre and diesel tax by 5.3 cents, lowering the gas tax rate to 9%.
- Maintained the Ontario Electricity Rebate, providing a 23.5% reduction on electricity bills for eligible households and small businesses.
- Removed the provincial portion of the HST on new homes for first-time homebuyers.
- Invested $4 billion through the Municipal Housing Infrastructure Program and $1.3 billion through the Housing-Enabling Water Systems Fund to support housing-related infrastructure.
- Continued the $1.2 billion Building Faster Fund to incentivize municipalities to meet housing targets.
- A further $41.5 million was allotted through the Indigenous Supportive Housing Program in 2025–2026
- Invested $83 million in student housing in Toronto.
- Signed a $108.5 million agreement with the federal government to expand school food programs, reaching an additional 160,000 children.
- Expanded eligibility for senior dental and co-payment programs, though still limited to low-income seniors.
- Invested $2 million to improve access to nutritious food in northern and remote First Nations communities.
Income Security
- Increased ODSP and ACSD benefits by 4.5%. Highlighted a 20% increase to ODSP over three years and continued indexation to inflation; rates remain widely considered inadequate.
- Expanded GAINS payments for seniors and indexed them to inflation.
- Increased minimum wage to $17.20 per hour.
- Maintained Ontario Works at $733/month, frozen since 2018.
- Exempted the Canada Disability Benefit from provincial income assistance clawbacks.
- Introduced a targeted benefits pension framework to improve pension portability.
Labour Market Supports
- Expanded the Skills Development Fund to $2.5 billion, including $955 million over three years for training in high-demand sectors.
- Invested $260 million in worker training and protection initiatives, with over $400 million in additional employment supports, including $35 million for training centres.
- Announced changes to OSAP reducing the share of non-repayable grants from 85% to 25%, increasing reliance on loans.
Ontario received an F for legislative progress this year. While the province introduced a range of affordability measures—including a one-time $200 rebate, gas tax reductions, electricity subsidies, and a modest increase to the minimum wage—these actions are broad-based and limited in impact for low-income households. Social assistance remains deeply inadequate. Ontario Works rates have not increased since 2018, and recent adjustments to ODSP, while indexed, fall far short of meeting current need.
At the same time, housing pressures continue to intensify. The province has weakened tenancy protections and maintained a rent control system that excludes newer units, contributing to rising rents and growing homelessness. Despite significant fiscal capacity, Ontario has not taken meaningful action to address income adequacy or housing affordability. Instead, the government has prioritized employment-focused measures, which do not reach many of those experiencing the deepest poverty. Taken together, current policies are unlikely to reduce poverty and may contribute to worsening outcomes.
Housing and Affordability
- Budget 2026 commits $53 million over three years to expand supportive housing initiatives for vulnerable populations and enhance access to critical mental health services and housing supports.
- Budget 2026 invests $186 million in 2026-27 through the Ontario Autism Program, bringing spending from $779 million in 2025-26 to $965 million next year.
- The government announced an investment of $407 million over three years to help community organizations manage rising costs and maintain essential services, including for people with people with developmental disabilities.
- Launched public consultations to inform the next Poverty Reduction Strategy, ahead of the expiry of the 2020–2025 plan.
- Reduced the provincial gas tax by 5.7 cents per litre and diesel tax by 5.3 cents, lowering the gas tax rate to 9%.
- Maintained the Ontario Electricity Rebate, providing a 23.5% reduction on electricity bills for eligible households and small businesses.
- Removed the provincial portion of the HST on new homes for first-time homebuyers.
- Invested $4 billion through the Municipal Housing Infrastructure Program and $1.3 billion through the Housing-Enabling Water Systems Fund to support housing-related infrastructure.
- Continued the $1.2 billion Building Faster Fund to incentivize municipalities to meet housing targets.
- A further $41.5 million was allotted through the Indigenous Supportive Housing Program in 2025–2026
- Invested $83 million in student housing in Toronto.
- Signed a $108.5 million agreement with the federal government to expand school food programs, reaching an additional 160,000 children.
- Expanded eligibility for senior dental and co-payment programs, though still limited to low-income seniors.
- Invested $2 million to improve access to nutritious food in northern and remote First Nations communities.
Income Security
- Increased ODSP and ACSD benefits by 4.5%. Highlighted a 20% increase to ODSP over three years and continued indexation to inflation; rates remain widely considered inadequate.
- Expanded GAINS payments for seniors and indexed them to inflation.
- Increased minimum wage to $17.20 per hour.
- Maintained Ontario Works at $733/month, frozen since 2018.
- Exempted the Canada Disability Benefit from provincial income assistance clawbacks.
- Introduced a targeted benefits pension framework to improve pension portability.
Labour Market Supports
- Expanded the Skills Development Fund to $2.5 billion, including $955 million over three years for training in high-demand sectors.
- Invested $260 million in worker training and protection initiatives, with over $400 million in additional employment supports, including $35 million for training centres.
- Announced changes to OSAP reducing the share of non-repayable grants from 85% to 25%, increasing reliance on loans.
Ontario received an F for legislative progress this year. While the province introduced a range of affordability measures—including a one-time $200 rebate, gas tax reductions, electricity subsidies, and a modest increase to the minimum wage—these actions are broad-based and limited in impact for low-income households. Social assistance remains deeply inadequate. Ontario Works rates have not increased since 2018, and recent adjustments to ODSP, while indexed, fall far short of meeting current need.
At the same time, housing pressures continue to intensify. The province has weakened tenancy protections and maintained a rent control system that excludes newer units, contributing to rising rents and growing homelessness. Despite significant fiscal capacity, Ontario has not taken meaningful action to address income adequacy or housing affordability. Instead, the government has prioritized employment-focused measures, which do not reach many of those experiencing the deepest poverty. Taken together, current policies are unlikely to reduce poverty and may contribute to worsening outcomes.
Political And Policy Landscape
After winning a third consecutive majority government in February 2025, the Progressive Conservative government is led by Doug Ford.
The Ontario government’s primary focus is addressing the economic impacts of the tariffs imposed by the U.S. government. Its actions to date include a $5 billion Strategic Response Fund to support the steel, aluminum, automotive, and manufacturing sectors. The 2025 Ontario budget projects a $14.6 billion deficit for 2025/26.
The March 2026 Ontario budget contains ongoing needed investments in training and job development for students entering skilled trades and construction and relief measures for workers in the manufacturing and automotive sectors. However, there are few measures aimed at addressing affordability, the inadequacy of social assistance rates, and inequality in the province, or the chronic underfunding in areas related to these issues. In short, the 2026 budget is simply a status quo document that demonstrates no effort to address the factors that are driving increasing numbers of people, including working people, to food banks.
The Provincial government has introduced some modest policies to address affordability issues — for example, lowering the provincial gas tax from 15% to 9%, introducing an electricity rebate, increasing the minimum wage, slightly increasing Ontario Disability Support Program (ODSP) rates, and indexing the Ontario Guaranteed Annual Income (GAINS) program for seniors to inflation.
It has also made investments in housing in response to increasing accommodation costs and the significant need for new housing.
Homes built before 2018 are protected by rent control — annual rent increases are limited to a percentage based on the Consumer Price Index for Ontario — but buildings built after 2018 are not, creating unequal tenant protections. Despite rent‑increase limits, loopholes have allowed rents to rise far faster than permitted: from 2014 to 2023, Ontario guidelines allowed cumulative increases of 16.5 per cent, yet average rents climbed 54.5 per cent, more than three times the legal rate.
Housing is an ongoing crisis in Ontario. Approximately 85,000 people are unhoused and it’s estimated that nearly a quarter (23%) are youth and children. This represents an increase of almost 8% since 2024 and is projected that there will be 300,000 unhoused people by 2035. The recent deterioration of tenancy protections from this bill risks exacerbating the situation.
Taken together, although some measures to address poverty and affordability have been implemented, they are modest and will not meaningfully impact the cost-of-living pressures people are facing, especially those who are living in poverty.
Ontario has the fiscal capacity to increase investments in affordable housing and social assistance programs, but the provincial government has been resistant to measures that could reduce poverty, preferring instead to focus on job creation and skills development to address inequality.
Policy Recommendations
Affordability
Restore full rent control coverage across Ontario’s housing stock.
Ontario faces some of the highest housing costs in Canada, alongside a sharp and ongoing rise in homelessness that is projected to continue in the absence of policy intervention. The 2018 amendment to the Residential Tenancies Act, which exempted new builds from rent control, has created a growing segment of the rental market without basic rent stability protections. To support affordability and housing security, Ontario should reinstate rent control for all rental units, regardless of construction date, to ensure consistent protections and limit rent escalation across the entire market.
Income Security
Introduce a new poverty reduction strategy with clear targets.
Ontario is in the process of launching a new Poverty Reduction Strategy, which is expected later this year. This strategy must come with clear, enforceable targets to reduce rising poverty rates across key groups, including children, single-parent families, equity-deserving populations, and working-age adults. The absence of a target in the previous strategy contributed to weak accountability and rising poverty. A renewed strategy should improve coordination across income, employment, and housing policy, with explicit attention to rapidly rising rents and core housing need. Poverty reduction targets should be grounded in the Market Basket Measure.
Make an element of the Low Income Individuals and Families Tax (LIFT) Credit refundable.
The LIFT Credit could reach more workers with low incomes. To make this happen, Ontario should make part of the LIFT Credit a refundable tax credit. For example, if $425 (that is, half of the maximum LIFT Credit) was made refundable for people with incomes over the maximum CWB threshold ($12,820 for single adults or $17,025 for families), their marginal effective tax rate would be lowered.
This would mean that when their CWB payments begin to decrease, the LIFT Credit would be activated, so individuals would always benefit from taking on more work.
Restore Ontario Works adequacy and increase earnings exemptions.
Ontario Works (OW) rates have been frozen since 2018, resulting in a significant erosion of real income supports over time. If OW rates had been indexed to inflation, they would now be substantially higher and would reflect the increased costs of basic necessities.
The current gap contributes to persistent income inadequacy and is a key driver of housing instability and homelessness. Ontario should both restore OW rates to their inflation-adjusted value and increase the monthly earnings exemption from $200 to $600 so that recipients can retain more earned income and overall income security improves.
Labour Market Reform
Improve work incentives for people who are part of the Ontario Disability Support Program (ODSP).
Recent changes to the ODSP allow recipients to keep the first $1,000 of earned income per month, a significant improvement from the previous $200 threshold. However, earnings above $1,000 continue to be clawed back at a rate of 75%. Reducing this clawback to 50%, consistent with existing earnings exemption rules, would improve work incentives and support recipients who are able to participate in the labour market.
Addressing Inequities
Ensure the Student Nutrition Program (SNP) and the First Nations Student Nutrition Program (FNSNP) keep pace with federal investments in the Canada’s National School Food Program.
In October 2025, the Government of Ontario announced an additional $5 million, for a total investment of $37.5 million, in the SNP and the FNSNP. While it was a welcome investment, school food advocates are concerned that Ontario is less than “all in” on meeting its commitment to working with the Federal Government to adequately fund the initiative.