Experience of Poverty
|
Experience of Poverty |
||
|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Data | 2026 Grade |
|
People Feeling Worse off Compared to Last Year
This grade is based on the percentage of respondents who indicated they are financially worse-off compared to one year prior. The grade was given a weight of 25/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
INC | INC |
|
People Feeling Worse off Compared to Last Year
This grade is based on the percentage of respondents who indicated they are financially worse-off compared to one year prior. The grade was given a weight of 25/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:INC |
||
2026 GradeINC |
||
|
People Paying More than 30% of Income on Housing
This grade is based on the percentage of respondents who indicated they are spending 30% or more of their income on housing. The grade was given a weight of 25/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
INC | INC |
|
People Paying More than 30% of Income on Housing
This grade is based on the percentage of respondents who indicated they are spending 30% or more of their income on housing. The grade was given a weight of 25/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:INC |
||
2026 GradeINC |
||
|
People Having Trouble Accessing Healthcare
This grade is based on the percentage of respondents who indicated they 'somewhat disagree’ or ‘strongly disagree’ with the statement ‘I can access and receive healthcare anytime I need to’ AND stated the reason was due to one or more of the following reasons: ‘I can't take time off work’; ‘I don’t have healthcare coverage’; ‘I don’t have money for medication’. The grade was given a weight of 10/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
INC | INC |
|
People Having Trouble Accessing Healthcare
This grade is based on the percentage of respondents who indicated they 'somewhat disagree’ or ‘strongly disagree’ with the statement ‘I can access and receive healthcare anytime I need to’ AND stated the reason was due to one or more of the following reasons: ‘I can't take time off work’; ‘I don’t have healthcare coverage’; ‘I don’t have money for medication’. The grade was given a weight of 10/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:INC |
||
2026 GradeINC |
||
|
Government Support Recipients Who Say Rates are Insufficient to Keep up with Cost of Living
This grade is based on the percentage of individuals who indicated that they ‘personally receive some form of social security benefit or support’ AND indicated that social assistance rates aren’t high enough to help me keep up with the cost of living’. The grade was given a weight of 25/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
INC | INC |
|
Government Support Recipients Who Say Rates are Insufficient to Keep up with Cost of Living
This grade is based on the percentage of individuals who indicated that they ‘personally receive some form of social security benefit or support’ AND indicated that social assistance rates aren’t high enough to help me keep up with the cost of living’. The grade was given a weight of 25/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:INC |
||
2026 GradeINC |
||
|
Percent of Income Spent on Fixed Costs beyond Housing
This grade is based on the combination of results from several questions asking the average amount individuals spend on fixed costs like internet, transport, groceries, and utilities. The average amounts spent were converted into a portion of income for those earning $75,000 a year or less (given in a range from lowest to highest). This number is the higher end of the range provided. The grade was given a weight of 15/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
INC | INC |
|
Percent of Income Spent on Fixed Costs beyond Housing
This grade is based on the combination of results from several questions asking the average amount individuals spend on fixed costs like internet, transport, groceries, and utilities. The average amounts spent were converted into a portion of income for those earning $75,000 a year or less (given in a range from lowest to highest). This number is the higher end of the range provided. The grade was given a weight of 15/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:INC |
||
2026 GradeINC |
||
Overall Grade INC |
||
Overall Grade: INC |
||
Last year, Food Banks Canada was unable to confidently assign the territories a grade because of limited sample sizes. Results across the territories were consolidated, which meant we could not accurately address each territory individually.
Data collection for the purpose of poverty reduction efforts in the north requires an approach that is unique, culturally sensitive, and tailored to the experiences of Indigenous peoples. Food Banks Canada continues to endeavour to find innovative ways to collect data that can drive effective policy solutions while respecting the diverse cultural and historical perspectives of northern communities.
In an effort to improve the quality of our data in 2026, we expanded our polling in the North through the addition of phone-based surveys and achieved a larger sample size. While this larger sample size allows for a higher degree of confidence in our analyses, the results still may not accurately represent the circumstances of all communities in the North for a variety of reasons:
- Many residents in the territories live in small communities that are spread out across a vast geographical area. Community experiences vary substantially, which means that statisticians must survey a much larger proportion of the population to achieve a representative sample.
- Many First Nations people have expressed distrust of government data collection because of historical and ongoing injustices, and therefore may be less likely to respond to polling. It is possible that these feelings of distrust are also held more broadly by Indigenous Peoples, who make up a large portion of the population of the territories.
- The territories have the lowest rate of high-speed internet access in the country, and in remote communities, that rate is even lower.
It is therefore very likely that those who are most vulnerable to poverty, including Indigenous people and isolated communities, were unable to respond to our survey.
Last year, Food Banks Canada was unable to confidently assign the territories a grade because of limited sample sizes. Results across the territories were consolidated, which meant we could not accurately address each territory individually.
Data collection for the purpose of poverty reduction efforts in the north requires an approach that is unique, culturally sensitive, and tailored to the experiences of Indigenous peoples. Food Banks Canada continues to endeavour to find innovative ways to collect data that can drive effective policy solutions while respecting the diverse cultural and historical perspectives of northern communities.
In an effort to improve the quality of our data in 2026, we expanded our polling in the North through the addition of phone-based surveys and achieved a larger sample size. While this larger sample size allows for a higher degree of confidence in our analyses, the results still may not accurately represent the circumstances of all communities in the North for a variety of reasons:
- Many residents in the territories live in small communities that are spread out across a vast geographical area. Community experiences vary substantially, which means that statisticians must survey a much larger proportion of the population to achieve a representative sample.
- Many First Nations people have expressed distrust of government data collection because of historical and ongoing injustices, and therefore may be less likely to respond to polling. It is possible that these feelings of distrust are also held more broadly by Indigenous Peoples, who make up a large portion of the population of the territories.
- The territories have the lowest rate of high-speed internet access in the country, and in remote communities, that rate is even lower.
It is therefore very likely that those who are most vulnerable to poverty, including Indigenous people and isolated communities, were unable to respond to our survey.
Poverty Measures
|
Poverty Measures |
||
|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Data | 2026 Grade |
|
Poverty Rate (MBM)
The poverty rate (MBM) is based on data from the Statistics Canada 2024 Canadian Income Survey (released in 2026) table showing poverty and low income statistics by selected demographic characteristics. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 40/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
10% | F |
|
Poverty Rate (MBM)
The poverty rate (MBM) is based on data from the Statistics Canada 2024 Canadian Income Survey (released in 2026) table showing poverty and low income statistics by selected demographic characteristics. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 40/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:10% |
||
2026 GradeF |
||
|
Provincial Welfare as a Percent of the Poverty Line (Singles)
This grade is based on the maximum annual provincial welfare income for a single unattached individual considered employable compared to the official poverty line of the provincial capital (the Market Basket Measure). The data is from Welfare in Canada 2025, available on Maytree’s website. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 15/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
79% | B+ |
|
Provincial Welfare as a Percent of the Poverty Line (Singles)
This grade is based on the maximum annual provincial welfare income for a single unattached individual considered employable compared to the official poverty line of the provincial capital (the Market Basket Measure). The data is from Welfare in Canada 2025, available on Maytree’s website. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 15/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:79% |
||
2026 GradeB+ |
||
|
Disability Assistance as a Percent of the Poverty Line
This grade is based on the maximum annual provincial welfare income for a single unattached individual with a disability compared to the official poverty line of the provincial capital (the Market Basket Measure). The data is from Welfare in Canada 2025, available on Maytree’s website. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 15/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
92.5% | A+ |
|
Disability Assistance as a Percent of the Poverty Line
This grade is based on the maximum annual provincial welfare income for a single unattached individual with a disability compared to the official poverty line of the provincial capital (the Market Basket Measure). The data is from Welfare in Canada 2025, available on Maytree’s website. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 15/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:92.5% |
||
2026 GradeA+ |
||
|
Unemployment Rate
This grade is based on Statistics Canada’s Labour force characteristics by province, monthly adjusted. This data is from March 2026. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 20/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
6.1% | D- |
|
Unemployment Rate
This grade is based on Statistics Canada’s Labour force characteristics by province, monthly adjusted. This data is from March 2026. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 20/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:6.1% |
||
2026 GradeD- |
||
|
Food Insecurity Rate
This grade is based on the combination of Marginal, Moderate, and Severe food insecurity rates from the Canadian Income Survey, 2024 (CIS) (released 2026). The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 40/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
12.1% | F |
|
Food Insecurity Rate
This grade is based on the combination of Marginal, Moderate, and Severe food insecurity rates from the Canadian Income Survey, 2024 (CIS) (released 2026). The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 40/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:12.1% |
||
2026 GradeF |
||
Overall Grade INC |
||
Overall Grade: INC |
||
- Poverty rate: The most recent available data (from 2024) show the poverty rate in the Northwest Territories is 10%, slightly below the national average of 11.1%. Quebec reports the lowest poverty rate among provinces at 7%.
- Social assistance as a percentage of the poverty line: In the Northwest Territories, social assistance provides 79% of the income needed to reach the poverty line, the strongest performance among all territories. Despite this comparatively strong performance, benefits fall well short of the poverty line.
- Disability assistance as a percentage of the poverty line: Disability assistance in the Northwest Territories reaches 92.5% of the poverty line, the highest among all jurisdictions nationally, coming closest to what is required.
- Unemployment rate: The Northwest Territories' unemployment rate is 6.1%, placing it in the mid-range among jurisdictions. The Yukon has the lowest unemployment rate among territories at 3.9%, while Saskatchewan has the lowest among provinces at 5%.
- Food insecurity: The most recent available data (from 2025) show that 16.4% of people in the Northwest Territories live in households experiencing food insecurity, well below the national average of 24% and among the lowest rates in the country. Quebec reports the lowest rate among provinces, where approximately 1 in 5 people experience food insecurity.
- Poverty rate: The most recent available data (from 2024) show the poverty rate in the Northwest Territories is 10%, slightly below the national average of 11.1%. Quebec reports the lowest poverty rate among provinces at 7%.
- Social assistance as a percentage of the poverty line: In the Northwest Territories, social assistance provides 79% of the income needed to reach the poverty line, the strongest performance among all territories. Despite this comparatively strong performance, benefits fall well short of the poverty line.
- Disability assistance as a percentage of the poverty line: Disability assistance in the Northwest Territories reaches 92.5% of the poverty line, the highest among all jurisdictions nationally, coming closest to what is required.
- Unemployment rate: The Northwest Territories' unemployment rate is 6.1%, placing it in the mid-range among jurisdictions. The Yukon has the lowest unemployment rate among territories at 3.9%, while Saskatchewan has the lowest among provinces at 5%.
- Food insecurity: The most recent available data (from 2025) show that 16.4% of people in the Northwest Territories live in households experiencing food insecurity, well below the national average of 24% and among the lowest rates in the country. Quebec reports the lowest rate among provinces, where approximately 1 in 5 people experience food insecurity.
Material Deprivation
|
Material Deprivation |
||
|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Data | 2026 Grade |
|
Inadequate Standard of Living
This grade is based on the % of individuals who were unable to afford 2 or more items from a list of items considered necessary for an adequate standard of living. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 40/100. Grades were determined using a grading scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
INC | INC |
|
Inadequate Standard of Living
This grade is based on the % of individuals who were unable to afford 2 or more items from a list of items considered necessary for an adequate standard of living. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 40/100. Grades were determined using a grading scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:INC |
||
2026 GradeINC |
||
|
Severely Inadequate Standard of Living
This grade is based on the % of individuals who were unable to afford 3 or more items from a list of items considered necessary for an adequate standard of living. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 60/100. Grades were determined using a grading scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
INC | INC |
|
Severely Inadequate Standard of Living
This grade is based on the % of individuals who were unable to afford 3 or more items from a list of items considered necessary for an adequate standard of living. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 60/100. Grades were determined using a grading scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:INC |
||
2026 GradeINC |
||
Overall Grade INC |
||
Overall Grade: INC |
||
See the section 1 context description. As the Material Deprivation Index is sourced from the same survey as section 1 results, we cannot reliably comment on the data as it may not reflect the real-life circumstances of many people living in the region.
See the section 1 context description. As the Material Deprivation Index is sourced from the same survey as section 1 results, we cannot reliably comment on the data as it may not reflect the real-life circumstances of many people living in the region.
Legislative Progress
|
Legislative Progress |
||
|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Data | 2026 Grade |
|
Legislative Progress
|
D |
|
|
Legislative Progress
|
||
Data: |
||
2026 GradeD |
||
Overall Grade D |
||
Overall Grade: D |
||
Housing and Affordability
- Introduced short-term measures to offset electricity cost increases, preventing large potential bill increases for households.
- Updated rent scales for market rental units. As a result, many tenants experienced substantial rent increases.
- Permanently increased subsidy rates and expanded eligibility for the Senior Home Heating Subsidy program.
- Expanded eligibility for debt forgiveness under Housing NWT to support housing stability.
- Signed a housing memorandum of agreement with Acho Dene Koe First Nation.
- Partnered with the Federal Government to support 64 new transitional and social housing units through a $24 million investment.
Income Security and Cost of Living
- Increased the minimum wage from $16.70 to $16.95 per hour. This is an increase of less than 2% and leaves the NWT with the lowest minimum wage among the territories.
- Partnered with the Federal Government to invest $1.75 million in community-led food security projects, supporting local food production and access.
Labour Market Supports
- Accessed federal supports for workers and businesses affected by tariffs, including supports for the softwood lumber sector.
The Northwest Territories received a D for legislative progress this year. It introduced some targeted measures, including short-term electricity cost relief, expanded home heating subsidies, and increased access to debt forgiveness through Housing NWT. It also partnered with the Federal Government to support 64 new housing units and invest in community-led food-security initiatives. However, these actions are limited relative to the scale of need. The territory continues to face a severe housing crisis, with estimates indicating a need for more than 2,000 new units; many of the homes are inadequate, requiring significant repairs. Recent rent increases for market rental units further compound affordability pressures, particularly for Indigenous households, which are disproportionately affected.
Progress on income security has been limited. Social assistance rates have not increased, and the minimum wage — now $16.95 — remains the lowest among the territories. While baseline income supports remain relatively stronger than in other jurisdictions, there have been no meaningful recent improvements. Overall, incremental actions have not kept pace with structural challenges.
Housing and Affordability
- Introduced short-term measures to offset electricity cost increases, preventing large potential bill increases for households.
- Updated rent scales for market rental units. As a result, many tenants experienced substantial rent increases.
- Permanently increased subsidy rates and expanded eligibility for the Senior Home Heating Subsidy program.
- Expanded eligibility for debt forgiveness under Housing NWT to support housing stability.
- Signed a housing memorandum of agreement with Acho Dene Koe First Nation.
- Partnered with the Federal Government to support 64 new transitional and social housing units through a $24 million investment.
Income Security and Cost of Living
- Increased the minimum wage from $16.70 to $16.95 per hour. This is an increase of less than 2% and leaves the NWT with the lowest minimum wage among the territories.
- Partnered with the Federal Government to invest $1.75 million in community-led food security projects, supporting local food production and access.
Labour Market Supports
- Accessed federal supports for workers and businesses affected by tariffs, including supports for the softwood lumber sector.
The Northwest Territories received a D for legislative progress this year. It introduced some targeted measures, including short-term electricity cost relief, expanded home heating subsidies, and increased access to debt forgiveness through Housing NWT. It also partnered with the Federal Government to support 64 new housing units and invest in community-led food-security initiatives. However, these actions are limited relative to the scale of need. The territory continues to face a severe housing crisis, with estimates indicating a need for more than 2,000 new units; many of the homes are inadequate, requiring significant repairs. Recent rent increases for market rental units further compound affordability pressures, particularly for Indigenous households, which are disproportionately affected.
Progress on income security has been limited. Social assistance rates have not increased, and the minimum wage — now $16.95 — remains the lowest among the territories. While baseline income supports remain relatively stronger than in other jurisdictions, there have been no meaningful recent improvements. Overall, incremental actions have not kept pace with structural challenges.
Political And Policy Landscape
The territory’s 2025/26 budget outlines the Government’s priorities, with an emphasis on balancing fiscal sustainability. Challenging conditions in this region, including heavy snow in some places and forest fires and drought in others, combined with high transportation costs in remote areas, create additional financial pressures to repair and support infrastructure and supply chains.
Housing and food costs remain two of the most endemic public policy challenges facing the Northwest Territories. Last year, the NWT announced the addition of 100 new housing units for the first time in decades. This year, through Housing Northwest Territories, the government completed a Territorial Housing Needs Assessment (THNA), a comprehensive review that emphasizes community and regional perspectives. This assessment should assist the government in planning affordable and attainable housing development.
The NWT does not have rent control, although renters are protected from eviction for a certain period. The territory should consider adopting a more comprehensive policy framework as it continues to act on expanding affordable housing and addressing challenges through the completion of the housing assessment.
There is significant economic potential in the NWT, although the short- to medium-term outlook appears dim. The territory has traditionally benefited from high employment and wage growth, but it offers limited sources of new investment. Economic growth is stagnating and declines in diamond mining and the oil and gas sector have reduced employment in the private sector. Meanwhile, government services and public sector employment have expanded since the COVID-19 pandemic, which has increased pressure on public funds.
Although it is still focused on fiscal sustainability, the 2025 budget announced several capital projects to improve transportation and energy corridors and a three-year investment for Housing Northwest Territory to replace and repair existing rental housing units. These projects act as an important economic anchor that can boost local economic activity and provide well-paying jobs for residents who might otherwise be at risk of falling into poverty.
More coordinated investment between the territorial and federal governments is urgently needed to make the most of the economic opportunities that major projects, both public and private, could bring to the region.
We have previously noted how a lack of access to broadband and Internet is a significant challenge in the territory. The 2026 budget does not earmark connectivity as a priority, placing residents behind most of the rest of Canada.
The NWT increased the minimum wage last year and decided to tie minimum wage increases to the CPI. Despite this move, the minimum wage is still $1.05 an hour below the federal standard.
The territory has one of the most generous welfare programs in the North. Absent from this year’s budget was the one-time top-up to income assistance provided last year to help address ongoing inflation and affordability concerns. Instead of direct financial support for individuals, the budget included an additional $62 million for health care and social services, including $809,000 in new funding to support the delivery of the Transitional Housing Addiction Recovery Program in Yellowknife and Inuvik. The NWT faces no significant fiscal issues with an essentially 0% debt-to-GDP ratio.
Policy Recommendations
Affordability
Raise the minimum wage.
The NWT’s minimum wage remains a full dollar below Ontario’s, despite a market basket threshold that is 24% higher in Yellowknife than in Toronto. The minimum wage should be at least 25% higher than Ontario’s and indexed to inflation from this level going forward. In 2025/26 this would translate into a minimum wage of $22.50 per hour.
Develop a formal municipal matching fund for rental unit construction.
The NWT should use Yukon’s successful municipal rental construction fund as a model to investigate the creation of a municipal/territorial grant-matching model to assist developers of purpose-built rental unit construction. The fund could be developed with a small pool of capital funding to begin with and scaled over time as dedicated funding is established.
Income Security
Increase and index the earned income exemption for people who receive Income Assistance.
In 2024, the NWT strengthened its Income Assistance program by increasing the earned income exemption to $350 per household per month, so households could retain more of their earnings. This was a positive step. Increasing the exemption to $500 and indexing it to inflation would better reflect current living costs and ensure the policy remains effective over time. A higher, indexed exemption would support greater income stability and make it easier for recipients to benefit from employment without facing immediate reductions in assistance.
Increase Income Assistance, the NWT Child Benefit, and all other benefit payments by 15% over the next three years, then index them to inflation moving forward.
Given the surge in inflation experienced since 2021, the lack of indexing has forced the NWT to intervene with temporary help rather than rely on an automatic stabilizer to assist residents in times of need.
Labour Market Reform
Update the 2023–28 Education Reform plan to take advantage of Prime Minister Carney’s recent announcement of $35B in Northern investment.
With the resurgence of global commodity prices, increased interest in Canadian mining, and new investments in defence infrastructure, the NWT is well positioned to be a key partner in initiatives in these sectors. We recommend that it work with the Federal Government to update its 2023–28 Education Renewal plan to ensure that this generational investment benefits young people preparing for and building their careers.
Addressing Inequities
Invest in Indigenous communities to enhance data collection and sovereignty to support poverty reduction measures.
The NWT Government should provide dedicated, long-term resources to Indigenous communities to strengthen data collection, governance, and sovereignty — recognizing that meaningful poverty measurement must be grounded in community trust, self-determination, and cultural relevance.
This investment should include funding for Nation-based data coordinators and statistical capacity, as well as support for communities to develop their own data governance frameworks aligned with principles such as the First Nations principles of OCAP (Ownership, Control, Access, and Possession) or the Global Indigenous Data Alliance's CARE Principles. Enhanced data capacity, built on a foundation of trust and sovereignty, is essential to accurately measure poverty across the territory and develop targeted, community-driven solutions that reflect the lived realities of Indigenous Peoples.