Experience of Poverty
|
Experience of Poverty |
||
|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Data | 2026 Grade |
|
People Feeling Worse off Compared to Last Year
This grade is based on the percentage of respondents who indicated they are financially worse-off compared to one year prior. The grade was given a weight of 25/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
45% | D |
|
People Feeling Worse off Compared to Last Year
This grade is based on the percentage of respondents who indicated they are financially worse-off compared to one year prior. The grade was given a weight of 25/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:45% |
||
2026 GradeD |
||
|
People Paying More than 30% of Income on Housing
This grade is based on the percentage of respondents who indicated they are spending 30% or more of their income on housing. The grade was given a weight of 25/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
37% | F |
|
People Paying More than 30% of Income on Housing
This grade is based on the percentage of respondents who indicated they are spending 30% or more of their income on housing. The grade was given a weight of 25/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:37% |
||
2026 GradeF |
||
|
People Having Trouble Accessing Healthcare
This grade is based on the percentage of respondents who indicated they 'somewhat disagree’ or ‘strongly disagree’ with the statement ‘I can access and receive healthcare anytime I need to’ AND stated the reason was due to one or more of the following reasons: ‘I can't take time off work’; ‘I don’t have healthcare coverage’; ‘I don’t have money for medication’. The grade was given a weight of 10/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
21% | F |
|
People Having Trouble Accessing Healthcare
This grade is based on the percentage of respondents who indicated they 'somewhat disagree’ or ‘strongly disagree’ with the statement ‘I can access and receive healthcare anytime I need to’ AND stated the reason was due to one or more of the following reasons: ‘I can't take time off work’; ‘I don’t have healthcare coverage’; ‘I don’t have money for medication’. The grade was given a weight of 10/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:21% |
||
2026 GradeF |
||
|
Government Support Recipients Who Say Rates are Insufficient to Keep up with Cost of Living
This grade is based on the percentage of individuals who indicated that they ‘personally receive some form of social security benefit or support’ AND indicated that ‘social assistance rates aren’t high enough to help me keep up with the cost of living’. The grade was given a weight of 25/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
70% | F |
|
Government Support Recipients Who Say Rates are Insufficient to Keep up with Cost of Living
This grade is based on the percentage of individuals who indicated that they ‘personally receive some form of social security benefit or support’ AND indicated that ‘social assistance rates aren’t high enough to help me keep up with the cost of living’. The grade was given a weight of 25/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:70% |
||
2026 GradeF |
||
|
Percent of Income Spent on Fixed Costs beyond Housing
This grade is based on the combination of results from several questions asking the average amount individuals spend on fixed costs like internet, transport, groceries, and utilities. The average amounts spent were converted into a portion of income for those earning $75,000 a year or less (given in a range from lowest to highest). This number is the higher end of the range provided. The grade was given a weight of 15/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
63.9% | F |
|
Percent of Income Spent on Fixed Costs beyond Housing
This grade is based on the combination of results from several questions asking the average amount individuals spend on fixed costs like internet, transport, groceries, and utilities. The average amounts spent were converted into a portion of income for those earning $75,000 a year or less (given in a range from lowest to highest). This number is the higher end of the range provided. The grade was given a weight of 15/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:63.9% |
||
2026 GradeF |
||
Overall Grade F |
||
Overall Grade: F |
||
New Brunswick received an F grade in 2026, the weakest overall performance among the provinces.
- Housing affordability: New Brunswick received a failing grade, as 37% of people spend 30% or more of their income on housing. This is worse than the equivalent figures in PEI and Nova Scotia. The level of challenge has been relatively static since 2024.
- Income spent on fixed costs outside of housing: New Brunswick received an F for this indicator, with people spending 63.9% of their income on essentials — the highest proportion nationally. This figure has increased steadily since 2024, when it was 59.3%.
- Access to health care: New Brunswick received an F, with 21% of people reporting difficulty accessing health care. This is worse than in Newfoundland and Labrador and PEI, although it marks a slight improvement over 2024 (23.4%) and 2025 (23%).
- Worse off than last year: 45% of people felt worse off than they did last year. This is the highest figure for this indicator in Atlantic Canada. After slight improvements in this figure in 2024 and 2025, hardship worsened again in 2026.
- Adequacy of government support: New Brunswick received an F for this indicator, with 70% of people who receive government support reporting that it is inadequate — a moderate increase since 2025 (68%) but a dramatic one compared to 2024 (35.7%). This was the highest proportion in Atlantic Canada and among the highest nationally.
New Brunswick received an F grade in 2026, the weakest overall performance among the provinces.
- Housing affordability: New Brunswick received a failing grade, as 37% of people spend 30% or more of their income on housing. This is worse than the equivalent figures in PEI and Nova Scotia. The level of challenge has been relatively static since 2024.
- Income spent on fixed costs outside of housing: New Brunswick received an F for this indicator, with people spending 63.9% of their income on essentials — the highest proportion nationally. This figure has increased steadily since 2024, when it was 59.3%.
- Access to health care: New Brunswick received an F, with 21% of people reporting difficulty accessing health care. This is worse than in Newfoundland and Labrador and PEI, although it marks a slight improvement over 2024 (23.4%) and 2025 (23%).
- Worse off than last year: 45% of people felt worse off than they did last year. This is the highest figure for this indicator in Atlantic Canada. After slight improvements in this figure in 2024 and 2025, hardship worsened again in 2026.
- Adequacy of government support: New Brunswick received an F for this indicator, with 70% of people who receive government support reporting that it is inadequate — a moderate increase since 2025 (68%) but a dramatic one compared to 2024 (35.7%). This was the highest proportion in Atlantic Canada and among the highest nationally.
Poverty Measures
|
Poverty Measures |
||
|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Data | 2026 Grade |
|
Poverty Rate (MBM)
The poverty rate (MBM) is based on data from the Statistics Canada 2024 Canadian Income Survey (released in 2026) table showing poverty and low income statistics by selected demographic characteristics. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 40/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
9.9% | F |
|
Poverty Rate (MBM)
The poverty rate (MBM) is based on data from the Statistics Canada 2024 Canadian Income Survey (released in 2026) table showing poverty and low income statistics by selected demographic characteristics. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 40/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:9.9% |
||
2026 GradeF |
||
|
Provincial Welfare as a Percent of the Poverty Line (Singles)
This grade is based on the maximum annual provincial welfare income for a single unattached individual considered employable compared to the official poverty line of the provincial capital (the Market Basket Measure). The data is from Welfare in Canada 2025, available on Maytree’s website. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 15/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
39.8% | D- |
|
Provincial Welfare as a Percent of the Poverty Line (Singles)
This grade is based on the maximum annual provincial welfare income for a single unattached individual considered employable compared to the official poverty line of the provincial capital (the Market Basket Measure). The data is from Welfare in Canada 2025, available on Maytree’s website. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 15/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:39.8% |
||
2026 GradeD- |
||
|
Provincial Disability Welfare as a Percent of the Poverty Line
This grade is based on the maximum annual provincial welfare income for a single unattached individual with a disability compared to the official poverty line of the provincial capital (the Market Basket Measure). The data is from Welfare in Canada 2025, available on Maytree’s website. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 15/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
51.6% | F |
|
Provincial Disability Welfare as a Percent of the Poverty Line
This grade is based on the maximum annual provincial welfare income for a single unattached individual with a disability compared to the official poverty line of the provincial capital (the Market Basket Measure). The data is from Welfare in Canada 2025, available on Maytree’s website. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 15/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:51.6% |
||
2026 GradeF |
||
|
Unemployment Rate
This grade is based on Statistics Canada’s Labour force characteristics by province, monthly adjusted. This data is from March 2026. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 20/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
7% | F |
|
Unemployment Rate
This grade is based on Statistics Canada’s Labour force characteristics by province, monthly adjusted. This data is from March 2026. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 20/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:7% |
||
2026 GradeF |
||
|
Food Insecurity Rate
This grade is based on the combination of Marginal, Moderate, and Severe food insecurity rates from the Canadian Income Survey, 2024 (CIS) (released 2026). The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 40/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
28.2% | F |
|
Food Insecurity Rate
This grade is based on the combination of Marginal, Moderate, and Severe food insecurity rates from the Canadian Income Survey, 2024 (CIS) (released 2026). The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 40/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:28.2% |
||
2026 GradeF |
||
Overall Grade F |
||
Overall Grade: F |
||
New Brunswick received an overall grade of F in the poverty measures section, the weakest performance among Atlantic provinces and one of the lowest in the country. Quebec received the highest grade (C), while New Brunswick was among the poorest performers nationally alongside Alberta, Ontario, and Nova Scotia.
- Poverty rate: The most recent available data (from 2024) show the poverty rate in New Brunswick is 9.9%, slightly below the national average of 11.1%. Quebec reports the lowest poverty rate among provinces at 7%.
- Social assistance as a percentage of the poverty line: In New Brunswick, social assistance provides just 39.8% of the income needed to reach the poverty line. Prince Edward Island performs strongest on this measure, with benefits covering 64.4% of the poverty line.
- Disability assistance as a percentage of the poverty line: Disability assistance in New Brunswick reaches just 51.6% of the poverty line, falling well short of what is required. Newfoundland and Labrador leads this indicator at 74.1%.
- Unemployment rate: New Brunswick's unemployment rate is 7%, higher than the national average of 6.7%. Saskatchewan has the lowest provincial unemployment rate at 5%.
- Food insecurity: The most recent available data (from 2025) show that 28.2% of people in New Brunswick live in households experiencing food insecurity, above the national average of 24% and significantly higher than Quebec, where approximately 1 in 5 people experience food insecurity.
New Brunswick received an overall grade of F in the poverty measures section, the weakest performance among Atlantic provinces and one of the lowest in the country. Quebec received the highest grade (C), while New Brunswick was among the poorest performers nationally alongside Alberta, Ontario, and Nova Scotia.
- Poverty rate: The most recent available data (from 2024) show the poverty rate in New Brunswick is 9.9%, slightly below the national average of 11.1%. Quebec reports the lowest poverty rate among provinces at 7%.
- Social assistance as a percentage of the poverty line: In New Brunswick, social assistance provides just 39.8% of the income needed to reach the poverty line. Prince Edward Island performs strongest on this measure, with benefits covering 64.4% of the poverty line.
- Disability assistance as a percentage of the poverty line: Disability assistance in New Brunswick reaches just 51.6% of the poverty line, falling well short of what is required. Newfoundland and Labrador leads this indicator at 74.1%.
- Unemployment rate: New Brunswick's unemployment rate is 7%, higher than the national average of 6.7%. Saskatchewan has the lowest provincial unemployment rate at 5%.
- Food insecurity: The most recent available data (from 2025) show that 28.2% of people in New Brunswick live in households experiencing food insecurity, above the national average of 24% and significantly higher than Quebec, where approximately 1 in 5 people experience food insecurity.
Material Deprivation
|
Material Deprivation |
||
|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Data | 2026 Grade |
|
Inadequate Standard of Living
|
36% | D- |
|
Inadequate Standard of Living
|
||
Data:36% |
||
2026 GradeD- |
||
|
Severely Inadequate Standard of Living
|
26% | D- |
|
Severely Inadequate Standard of Living
|
||
Data:26% |
||
2026 GradeD- |
||
Overall Grade D- |
||
Overall Grade: D- |
||
New Brunswick received a D− grade in 2026, making it the weakest performer among the provinces.
This grade reflects a decline from the province’s D+ in 2025 and indicates worsening conditions. This situation sets New Brunswick apart from the rest of the country, which broadly saw reduced deprivation.
Both severe deprivation and moderate deprivation rose, to 26% and 36% respectively, the highest rates nationally by a relatively large margin. Both indicators are 5 percentage points higher than the second worst performing province. The increase signals intensifying hardship rather than stabilization.
Overall, New Brunswick’s material deprivation results point to deep and growing material deprivation.
New Brunswick received a D− grade in 2026, making it the weakest performer among the provinces.
This grade reflects a decline from the province’s D+ in 2025 and indicates worsening conditions. This situation sets New Brunswick apart from the rest of the country, which broadly saw reduced deprivation.
Both severe deprivation and moderate deprivation rose, to 26% and 36% respectively, the highest rates nationally by a relatively large margin. Both indicators are 5 percentage points higher than the second worst performing province. The increase signals intensifying hardship rather than stabilization.
Overall, New Brunswick’s material deprivation results point to deep and growing material deprivation.
Legislative Progress
|
Legislative Progress |
||
|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Data | 2026 Grade |
|
Legislative Progress
|
D |
|
|
Legislative Progress
|
||
Data: |
||
2026 GradeD |
||
Overall Grade D |
||
Overall Grade: D |
||
- Exempted the Canada Disability Benefit from clawbacks and released a new Disability Action Plan that emphasizes the need for poverty reduction and includes recommendations to expand income programs.
- Reached a $150 million agreement with Build Canada Homes to create more than 1,200 new affordable homes. Kept the rent cap at 3% for the 2025/26 fiscal year and increased rental benefits by $21 million to support an additional 2,500 households. Released its new homelessness strategy, with targets to reduce homelessness by 40% by 2028/29.
- Removed the carbon cost adjuster, lowering gasoline prices by roughly 7–9 cents per litre and kept the 10% HST rebate on electricity.
- Partnered with Bell Canada to improve cellular services in rural areas.
- Increased the minimum wage by 1.6% on April 1, 2026 to $15.90/hour.
- Signed revenue-sharing agreement with eight Mi’kmaq First Nation communities and with the six Chiefs of the Wolastoqey Nation. This initiative means provincial tax revenue from businesses within the First Nation communities and reserve lands will be shared among communities.
- Announced free breakfasts in all New Brunswick schools through a partnership with Feed NB.
- Provided $2.5 million in funding to Feed NB.
New Brunswick received a D for legislative progress this year. The province continued to take steps on housing and affordability, including extending the rent cap, expanding rental benefits, and committing to 1,200 new affordable homes. It also exempted the Canada Disability Benefit from clawbacks and introduced universal school breakfasts, improving access to food for children across the province. However, progress has been uneven. Despite a stated commitment to reduce poverty, there has been no meaningful increase in social assistance, with the government maintaining previously established indexation rather than raising rates. Social assistance remains among the lowest in the country. In addition, key housing supports, including the rent cap and rental benefit, remain temporary. While new strategies signal intent, the absence of durable income supports suggests persistent gaps.
- Exempted the Canada Disability Benefit from clawbacks and released a new Disability Action Plan that emphasizes the need for poverty reduction and includes recommendations to expand income programs.
- Reached a $150 million agreement with Build Canada Homes to create more than 1,200 new affordable homes. Kept the rent cap at 3% for the 2025/26 fiscal year and increased rental benefits by $21 million to support an additional 2,500 households. Released its new homelessness strategy, with targets to reduce homelessness by 40% by 2028/29.
- Removed the carbon cost adjuster, lowering gasoline prices by roughly 7–9 cents per litre and kept the 10% HST rebate on electricity.
- Partnered with Bell Canada to improve cellular services in rural areas.
- Increased the minimum wage by 1.6% on April 1, 2026 to $15.90/hour.
- Signed revenue-sharing agreement with eight Mi’kmaq First Nation communities and with the six Chiefs of the Wolastoqey Nation. This initiative means provincial tax revenue from businesses within the First Nation communities and reserve lands will be shared among communities.
- Announced free breakfasts in all New Brunswick schools through a partnership with Feed NB.
- Provided $2.5 million in funding to Feed NB.
New Brunswick received a D for legislative progress this year. The province continued to take steps on housing and affordability, including extending the rent cap, expanding rental benefits, and committing to 1,200 new affordable homes. It also exempted the Canada Disability Benefit from clawbacks and introduced universal school breakfasts, improving access to food for children across the province. However, progress has been uneven. Despite a stated commitment to reduce poverty, there has been no meaningful increase in social assistance, with the government maintaining previously established indexation rather than raising rates. Social assistance remains among the lowest in the country. In addition, key housing supports, including the rent cap and rental benefit, remain temporary. While new strategies signal intent, the absence of durable income supports suggests persistent gaps.
Political And Policy Landscape
In October 2024, New Brunswick elected a Liberal government under Premier Susan Holt with a strong mandate focused on affordability. Key commitments included increasing social assistance rates, implementing a rent cap, expanding affordable housing, and reducing costs for low-income households.
The government moved quickly on several visible commitments. A province-wide rent cap of 3% was introduced, and there has been progress toward expanding school food programming, including universal free breakfasts and a planned universal lunch program. The government has also prioritized health care expansion, including the rollout of community care clinics.
In February 2025, the government released an updated poverty reduction plan that maintains the original target of reducing poverty by 50% from 2015 levels by 2030. The plan is built on three pillars — basic needs, income security, and service delivery — and reflects key issues raised during consultations, including low social assistance rates, barriers to accessing benefits, and gaps in transportation, particularly in rural areas, and health care access. The strategy includes commitments to collaborate across sectors to improve food security, expand access to transportation, increase awareness and uptake of benefits, and improve working conditions for workers with low incomes. Food insecurity is identified as a priority issue, but the primary responses outlined are school food programs, support for social enterprises, and further study of community-based initiatives. The strategy places significant emphasis on coordination, awareness, and system navigation, rather than introducing new income supports or expanding existing benefits.
The strategy’s focus is most evident in the government’s approach to social assistance. While benefits continue to be indexed to inflation under reforms introduced under the previous Progressive Conservative government in 2021, Budget 2026 did not include any increase to base rates, despite a clear campaign commitment to raise them. As a result, social assistance policy remains largely unchanged, relying on indexation rather than substantive increases to improve its adequacy.
The government has also committed to building 30,000 new homes by 2030 and has exceeded short-term targets for affordable housing starts. Investments have been made in public housing repair, supportive housing services, and community housing programs, alongside the introduction of the rent cap. However, demand continues to outpace supply, and the scale of investment in deeply affordable housing remains limited relative to need.
Budget 2026 represents a significant shift in the province’s fiscal outlook. The government is projecting a record deficit of approximately $1.37 billion and continued deficits across the remainder of its mandate, despite a campaign commitment to balance the budget. Net debt is expected to increase from $13.9 billion to $19.7 billion by 2029.
Although the government had warned that tough choices and spending cuts were on the way, ultimately it reversed course. Departments were asked to identify savings equivalent to 10% of their budgets. However, while limited reductions were made in select departments, overall government spending is projected to increase by approximately 5.5%, with health care spending rising by 17%.
The government has framed this approach as necessary to address underinvestment in public services, particularly in health care. At the same time, it represents a departure from earlier commitments to be fiscally disciplined and places the province on a path of sustained deficits and increasing debt.
Within this fiscal context, affordability measures in the budget are relatively modest. Investments include $10.2 million for supportive housing services, $17 million for the Community Housing Retention and Expansion Program, and $7 million for school food programs, in addition to continued electricity rebates. However, there were no new increases to rental benefits, no significant expansion of affordable housing programs, and no increases to social assistance beyond indexation.
At the same time, cost pressures are expected to increase. NB Power has proposed a series of rate increases that would result in substantial cumulative increases by 2028. While the government has committed to reviewing NB Power, no measures have been introduced to offset these increases for households.
New Brunswick’s policy landscape is therefore defined by a gap between the government’s initial mandate and its early policy decisions. While progress has been made in areas such as housing supply and service expansion, key commitments related to income supports have not been implemented. At the same time, fiscal decisions outlined in Budget 2026 indicate a shift away from earlier commitments to restraint, with growing deficits and debt shaping the province’s policy environment going forward.
Policy Recommendations
Affordability
Make the temporary rent increase cap permanent within the Residential Tenancies Act and strengthen tenant protections.
New Brunswick has introduced a temporary 3% rent cap, but it is set to expire. Introducing a permanent rent increase limit — connected to the CPI — in legislation, alongside enhanced protections against displacement, would provide greater stability for renters who are facing rising housing costs. Housing affordability was identified during the poverty reduction consultations as one of the main drivers of food insecurity, making stronger tenant protections an essential component of the province’s strategy.
Prioritize public and non profit housing development, repair, and acquisition.
As New Brunswick advances its Housing for All strategy and its target of 30,000 new homes by 2030, it should ensure that a significant portion of this supply is delivered through public, non profit, or community housing. Expanding and protecting affordable housing stock is critical to meeting the strategy’s objectives related to basic needs and overall well-being.
Income Security
Raise social assistance to an adequacy benchmark and advance a disability basic income framework
Although rates are indexed to inflation, current benefit levels remain well below the cost of basic needs. The province should adopt a multi-year plan to raise assistance toward the MBM over the length of this mandate. Building on the Minister of Social Development's mandate commitment to explore basic income for people with disabilities, the province should advance a concrete program design with a defined timeline.
Labour Market Reform
Establish a youth employment and training guarantee.
New Brunswick should introduce a youth strategy to ensure that all young people not in employment, education, or training (NEET) have access to paid training, apprenticeship opportunities, or a wage-subsidized job. Supports for transportation, childcare, and other participation barriers should be built into the program design to facilitate sustained engagement.
Establish a pathway to increase the minimum wage to become a living wage.
Participants in the provincial consultations emphasized that current minimum wage levels remain insufficient given the rising costs of living. A clear, multi year plan to move the minimum wage toward a living wage benchmark would support workers with low incomes and strengthen progress toward the poverty reduction strategy’s income-security goals.
Addressing Inequities
Establish a community-based benefit navigation and service access strategy in partnership with municipalities.
Building on the strategy’s commitment to people-focused service delivery, New Brunswick should fund municipalities and community organizations to expand awareness of income-tested benefits and offer accessible, in-person application support. As government services increasingly shift toward digital models, ensuring alternative access points — especially in rural areas — will be essential to prevent service gaps.