Experience of Poverty
|
Experience of Poverty |
||
|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Data | 2026 Grade |
|
People Feeling Worse off Compared to Last Year
This grade is based on the percentage of respondents who indicated they are financially worse-off compared to one year prior. The grade was given a weight of 25/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
37% | B- |
|
People Feeling Worse off Compared to Last Year
This grade is based on the percentage of respondents who indicated they are financially worse-off compared to one year prior. The grade was given a weight of 25/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:37% |
||
2026 GradeB- |
||
|
People Paying More than 30% of Income on Housing
This grade is based on the percentage of respondents who indicated they are spending 30% or more of their income on housing. The grade was given a weight of 25/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
33% | C- |
|
People Paying More than 30% of Income on Housing
This grade is based on the percentage of respondents who indicated they are spending 30% or more of their income on housing. The grade was given a weight of 25/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:33% |
||
2026 GradeC- |
||
|
People Having Trouble Accessing Healthcare
This grade is based on the percentage of respondents who indicated they 'somewhat disagree’ or ‘strongly disagree’ with the statement ‘I can access and receive healthcare anytime I need to’ AND stated the reason was due to one or more of the following reasons: ‘I can't take time off work’; ‘I don’t have healthcare coverage’; ‘I don’t have money for medication’. The grade was given a weight of 10/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
56% | F |
|
People Having Trouble Accessing Healthcare
This grade is based on the percentage of respondents who indicated they 'somewhat disagree’ or ‘strongly disagree’ with the statement ‘I can access and receive healthcare anytime I need to’ AND stated the reason was due to one or more of the following reasons: ‘I can't take time off work’; ‘I don’t have healthcare coverage’; ‘I don’t have money for medication’. The grade was given a weight of 10/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:56% |
||
2026 GradeF |
||
|
Government Support Recipients Who Say Rates are Insufficient to Keep up with Cost of Living
This grade is based on the percentage of individuals who indicated that they ‘personally receive some form of social security benefit or support’ AND indicated that ‘social assistance rates aren’t high enough to help me keep up with the cost of living’. The grade was given a weight of 25/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
51% | F |
|
Government Support Recipients Who Say Rates are Insufficient to Keep up with Cost of Living
This grade is based on the percentage of individuals who indicated that they ‘personally receive some form of social security benefit or support’ AND indicated that ‘social assistance rates aren’t high enough to help me keep up with the cost of living’. The grade was given a weight of 25/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:51% |
||
2026 GradeF |
||
|
Percent of Income Spent on Fixed Costs beyond Housing
This grade is based on the combination of results from several questions asking the average amount individuals spend on fixed costs like internet, transport, groceries, and utilities. The average amounts spent were converted into a portion of income for those earning $75,000 a year or less (given in a range from lowest to highest). This number is the higher end of the range provided. The grade was given a weight of 15/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
53.2% | B- |
|
Percent of Income Spent on Fixed Costs beyond Housing
This grade is based on the combination of results from several questions asking the average amount individuals spend on fixed costs like internet, transport, groceries, and utilities. The average amounts spent were converted into a portion of income for those earning $75,000 a year or less (given in a range from lowest to highest). This number is the higher end of the range provided. The grade was given a weight of 15/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:53.2% |
||
2026 GradeB- |
||
Overall Grade C- |
||
Overall Grade: C- |
||
Manitoba received a C−grade in 2026. It performed better than its Prairie peers despite serious gaps in health care access and supports.
- Housing affordability: Manitoba received a C−, with 33% of people spending 30% or more of their income on housing — the best result nationally. After a sharp increase in 2024, housing stress has eased more in Manitoba than anywhere in the country.
- Income spent on fixed costs outside of housing: Manitoba earned a B−, with 53.2% of people’s income going to fixed costs. This is the lowest among the Prairie provinces and well below the national average. It is also a significant improvement on the 2025 figure of 62.12% and suggests cost pressure is easing.
- Access to health care: Manitoba received a failing grade for this indicator, with 56% of people reporting difficulty accessing health care. This is the worst rate for this indicator in the country. The sharp increase in 2026 signals a major, concerning deterioration.
- Worse off than last year: 37% of people felt worse off than they did last year. This was the lowest proportion in the Prairie region for this indicator. In 2025, 41% of people felt worse off, so the decline in 2026 suggests improving financial perceptions.
- Adequacy of government support: Manitoba received an F, with 51% of people who receive government support reporting that it is inadequate. Manitoba performs best in the country on this indicator, suggesting the inadequacy of social supports is a national and worsening issue.
Manitoba received a C−grade in 2026. It performed better than its Prairie peers despite serious gaps in health care access and supports.
- Housing affordability: Manitoba received a C−, with 33% of people spending 30% or more of their income on housing — the best result nationally. After a sharp increase in 2024, housing stress has eased more in Manitoba than anywhere in the country.
- Income spent on fixed costs outside of housing: Manitoba earned a B−, with 53.2% of people’s income going to fixed costs. This is the lowest among the Prairie provinces and well below the national average. It is also a significant improvement on the 2025 figure of 62.12% and suggests cost pressure is easing.
- Access to health care: Manitoba received a failing grade for this indicator, with 56% of people reporting difficulty accessing health care. This is the worst rate for this indicator in the country. The sharp increase in 2026 signals a major, concerning deterioration.
- Worse off than last year: 37% of people felt worse off than they did last year. This was the lowest proportion in the Prairie region for this indicator. In 2025, 41% of people felt worse off, so the decline in 2026 suggests improving financial perceptions.
- Adequacy of government support: Manitoba received an F, with 51% of people who receive government support reporting that it is inadequate. Manitoba performs best in the country on this indicator, suggesting the inadequacy of social supports is a national and worsening issue.
Poverty Measures
|
Poverty Measures |
||
|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Data | 2026 Grade |
|
Poverty Rate (MBM)
The poverty rate (MBM) is based on data from the Statistics Canada 2024 Canadian Income Survey (released in 2026) table showing poverty and low income statistics by selected demographic characteristics. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 40/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
12.3% | F |
|
Poverty Rate (MBM)
The poverty rate (MBM) is based on data from the Statistics Canada 2024 Canadian Income Survey (released in 2026) table showing poverty and low income statistics by selected demographic characteristics. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 40/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:12.3% |
||
2026 GradeF |
||
|
Provincial Welfare as a Percent of the Poverty Line (Singles)
This grade is based on the maximum annual provincial welfare income for a single unattached individual considered employable compared to the official poverty line of the provincial capital (the Market Basket Measure). The data is from Welfare in Canada 2025, available on Maytree’s website. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 15/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
39% | D- |
|
Provincial Welfare as a Percent of the Poverty Line (Singles)
This grade is based on the maximum annual provincial welfare income for a single unattached individual considered employable compared to the official poverty line of the provincial capital (the Market Basket Measure). The data is from Welfare in Canada 2025, available on Maytree’s website. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 15/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:39% |
||
2026 GradeD- |
||
|
Provincial Disability Welfare as a Percent of the Poverty Line
This grade is based on the maximum annual provincial welfare income for a single unattached individual with a disability compared to the official poverty line of the provincial capital (the Market Basket Measure). The data is from Welfare in Canada 2025, available on Maytree’s website. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 15/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
59.6% | D+ |
|
Provincial Disability Welfare as a Percent of the Poverty Line
This grade is based on the maximum annual provincial welfare income for a single unattached individual with a disability compared to the official poverty line of the provincial capital (the Market Basket Measure). The data is from Welfare in Canada 2025, available on Maytree’s website. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 15/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:59.6% |
||
2026 GradeD+ |
||
|
Unemployment Rate
This grade is based on Statistics Canada’s Labour force characteristics by province, monthly adjusted. This data is from March 2026. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 20/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
5.6% | D |
|
Unemployment Rate
This grade is based on Statistics Canada’s Labour force characteristics by province, monthly adjusted. This data is from March 2026. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 20/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:5.6% |
||
2026 GradeD |
||
|
Food Insecurity Rate
This grade is based on the combination of Marginal, Moderate, and Severe food insecurity rates from the Canadian Income Survey, 2024 (CIS) (released 2026). The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 40/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
27.9% | F |
|
Food Insecurity Rate
This grade is based on the combination of Marginal, Moderate, and Severe food insecurity rates from the Canadian Income Survey, 2024 (CIS) (released 2026). The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 40/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:27.9% |
||
2026 GradeF |
||
Overall Grade D- |
||
Overall Grade: D- |
||
Manitoba received an overall grade of D− in the poverty measures section. Quebec received the highest grade (C), while most other provinces received a D− or F, indicating broadly weak performance across the country.
- Poverty rate: The most recent available data (from 2024) show the poverty rate in Manitoba is 12.3%, above the national average of 11.1%. Quebec reports the lowest poverty rate among provinces at 7%.
- Social assistance as a percentage of the poverty line: In Manitoba, social assistance provides just 39% of the income needed to reach the poverty line. Prince Edward Island performs strongest on this measure, with benefits covering 64.4% of the poverty line.
- Disability assistance as a percentage of the poverty line: Disability assistance in Manitoba reaches 59.6% of the poverty line, falling short of what is required. Newfoundland and Labrador leads this indicator at 74.1%.
- Unemployment rate: Manitoba's unemployment rate is 5.6%, below the national average of 6.7%. Saskatchewan has the lowest provincial unemployment rate at 5%.
- Food insecurity: The most recent available data (from 2025) show that 27.9% of people in Manitoba live in households experiencing food insecurity, above the national average of 24% and significantly higher than Quebec, where approximately 1 in 5 people experience food insecurity.
Manitoba received an overall grade of D− in the poverty measures section. Quebec received the highest grade (C), while most other provinces received a D− or F, indicating broadly weak performance across the country.
- Poverty rate: The most recent available data (from 2024) show the poverty rate in Manitoba is 12.3%, above the national average of 11.1%. Quebec reports the lowest poverty rate among provinces at 7%.
- Social assistance as a percentage of the poverty line: In Manitoba, social assistance provides just 39% of the income needed to reach the poverty line. Prince Edward Island performs strongest on this measure, with benefits covering 64.4% of the poverty line.
- Disability assistance as a percentage of the poverty line: Disability assistance in Manitoba reaches 59.6% of the poverty line, falling short of what is required. Newfoundland and Labrador leads this indicator at 74.1%.
- Unemployment rate: Manitoba's unemployment rate is 5.6%, below the national average of 6.7%. Saskatchewan has the lowest provincial unemployment rate at 5%.
- Food insecurity: The most recent available data (from 2025) show that 27.9% of people in Manitoba live in households experiencing food insecurity, above the national average of 24% and significantly higher than Quebec, where approximately 1 in 5 people experience food insecurity.
Material Deprivation
|
Material Deprivation |
||
|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Data | 2026 Grade |
|
Inadequate Standard of Living
This grade is based on the % of individuals who were unable to afford 2 or more items from a list of items considered necessary for an adequate standard of living. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 40/100. Grades were determined using a grading scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
26% | B |
|
Inadequate Standard of Living
This grade is based on the % of individuals who were unable to afford 2 or more items from a list of items considered necessary for an adequate standard of living. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 40/100. Grades were determined using a grading scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:26% |
||
2026 GradeB |
||
|
Severely Inadequate Standard of Living
This grade is based on the % of individuals who were unable to afford 3 or more items from a list of items considered necessary for an adequate standard of living. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 60/100. Grades were determined using a grading scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
18% | B- |
|
Severely Inadequate Standard of Living
This grade is based on the % of individuals who were unable to afford 3 or more items from a list of items considered necessary for an adequate standard of living. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 60/100. Grades were determined using a grading scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:18% |
||
2026 GradeB- |
||
Overall Grade B- |
||
Overall Grade: B- |
||
Manitoba received a B− grade for material deprivation in 2026, reflecting a strong improvement relative to recent years.
This grade places it among the stronger performing provinces and marks a notable upgrade from the C− it received in 2025. The improvement exceeds the national trend, indicating accelerated progress.
Severe deprivation fell to 18% in 2026, the lowest level since 2024 and the second lowest among the provinces after Quebec. Moderate deprivation also dropped sharply to 26% from 34% in 2025 — the sharpest drop in the country. Only Quebec has a lower rate of deprivation. These decreases suggest tangible improvements in living standards for the materially least well‑off.
Manitoba stands out for translating improvements into reductions in both severe and moderate deprivation, rather than seeing gains confined to one group.
Overall, Manitoba’s material deprivation results indicate meaningful reductions in hardship and improved capacity for residents to afford basic necessities.
Manitoba received a B− grade for material deprivation in 2026, reflecting a strong improvement relative to recent years.
This grade places it among the stronger performing provinces and marks a notable upgrade from the C− it received in 2025. The improvement exceeds the national trend, indicating accelerated progress.
Severe deprivation fell to 18% in 2026, the lowest level since 2024 and the second lowest among the provinces after Quebec. Moderate deprivation also dropped sharply to 26% from 34% in 2025 — the sharpest drop in the country. Only Quebec has a lower rate of deprivation. These decreases suggest tangible improvements in living standards for the materially least well‑off.
Manitoba stands out for translating improvements into reductions in both severe and moderate deprivation, rather than seeing gains confined to one group.
Overall, Manitoba’s material deprivation results indicate meaningful reductions in hardship and improved capacity for residents to afford basic necessities.
Legislative Progress
|
Legislative Progress |
||
|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Data | 2026 Grade |
|
Legislative Progress
|
B |
|
|
Legislative Progress
|
||
Data: |
||
2026 GradeB |
||
Overall Grade B |
||
Overall Grade: B |
||
- Invested $12.8 million in new grant funding to create 215 units of social and affordable housing, along with wraparound supports including mental health and addictions treatment for Manitobans transitioning from encampments to supportive housing. Housing advocates have noted that the 2025 budget committed to 760 units.
- Increased the Homeowners Affordability Tax Credit to $1,700 (up from $1,600), effective for the 2027 property tax year — with some restrictions.
- Increased the Renters Affordability Tax Credit to $675 (up from $625), with the seniors’ top-up rising to $386 (from $357) for people with net household income below $40,000. The government is also exploring options to deliver rent relief sooner rather than having people wait until April each year.
- Eliminated childcare fees for families with low incomes. This affects approximately 3,500 families and 5,000 children and marks the first time any Canadian government has made childcare free for people who need the most help. The budget also committed to 2,000 new childcare spaces and an increase in wages for childcare workers.
- Removed the provincial sales tax (PST) from all food sold in grocery stores, effective July 1, 2026, building on legislation introduced to address predatory and differential pricing by large grocery companies (Government of Manitoba, 2026b).
- Proposed $10 million to make public transit free for children and youth.
- Invested $2.5 million in adult literacy programs, including $1 million for First Nations and Northern communities.
- Froze Employment and Income Assistance rates for a fourth consecutive year. Critics noted that food costs have risen 20% over that period and that the 30,000 households that rely on provincial social assistance did not see increases in their basic needs budgets.
Manitoba earned a B for legislative progress this year. On one hand, the province took genuinely notable steps: Eliminating childcare fees for families with low incomes — the first such measure by any Canadian government — is a landmark poverty-reduction action that will meaningfully improve affordability for approximately 3,500 families and 5,000 children. Removing PST from groceries effective July 1, 2026, will provide real relief for households with low incomes, as they spend a disproportionate share of their income on food. Free transit for children and youth, expanded adult literacy funding with dedicated First Nations and Northern community investment, and the Renters Affordability Tax Credit increase round out a set of measures that individually show progressive intent.
However, the government’s fourth consecutive freeze of Employment and Income Assistance rates is a serious regression that prevents the province from improving their grade. Over the same four-year period, food costs have risen approximately 20%, meaning the 30,000 households that are the most dependent on provincial support — that is, the population the rubric identifies as the core concern of poverty legislation — have experienced a sustained and compounding decline in real purchasing power. The affordable housing investment of $12.8 million for 215 units represents a sharp drop from the 670 units the government committed to in the previous budget. The absence of any increase in core income assistance, combined with reduced housing commitments, means that Manitoba’s most vulnerable residents are materially worse off than they were last year.
- Invested $12.8 million in new grant funding to create 215 units of social and affordable housing, along with wraparound supports including mental health and addictions treatment for Manitobans transitioning from encampments to supportive housing. Housing advocates have noted that the 2025 budget committed to 760 units.
- Increased the Homeowners Affordability Tax Credit to $1,700 (up from $1,600), effective for the 2027 property tax year — with some restrictions.
- Increased the Renters Affordability Tax Credit to $675 (up from $625), with the seniors’ top-up rising to $386 (from $357) for people with net household income below $40,000. The government is also exploring options to deliver rent relief sooner rather than having people wait until April each year.
- Eliminated childcare fees for families with low incomes. This affects approximately 3,500 families and 5,000 children and marks the first time any Canadian government has made childcare free for people who need the most help. The budget also committed to 2,000 new childcare spaces and an increase in wages for childcare workers.
- Removed the provincial sales tax (PST) from all food sold in grocery stores, effective July 1, 2026, building on legislation introduced to address predatory and differential pricing by large grocery companies (Government of Manitoba, 2026b).
- Proposed $10 million to make public transit free for children and youth.
- Invested $2.5 million in adult literacy programs, including $1 million for First Nations and Northern communities.
- Froze Employment and Income Assistance rates for a fourth consecutive year. Critics noted that food costs have risen 20% over that period and that the 30,000 households that rely on provincial social assistance did not see increases in their basic needs budgets.
Manitoba earned a B for legislative progress this year. On one hand, the province took genuinely notable steps: Eliminating childcare fees for families with low incomes — the first such measure by any Canadian government — is a landmark poverty-reduction action that will meaningfully improve affordability for approximately 3,500 families and 5,000 children. Removing PST from groceries effective July 1, 2026, will provide real relief for households with low incomes, as they spend a disproportionate share of their income on food. Free transit for children and youth, expanded adult literacy funding with dedicated First Nations and Northern community investment, and the Renters Affordability Tax Credit increase round out a set of measures that individually show progressive intent.
However, the government’s fourth consecutive freeze of Employment and Income Assistance rates is a serious regression that prevents the province from improving their grade. Over the same four-year period, food costs have risen approximately 20%, meaning the 30,000 households that are the most dependent on provincial support — that is, the population the rubric identifies as the core concern of poverty legislation — have experienced a sustained and compounding decline in real purchasing power. The affordable housing investment of $12.8 million for 215 units represents a sharp drop from the 670 units the government committed to in the previous budget. The absence of any increase in core income assistance, combined with reduced housing commitments, means that Manitoba’s most vulnerable residents are materially worse off than they were last year.
Political And Policy Landscape
Manitoba’s current government has been in power since 2023. It has positioned itself around a clear narrative of rebuilding public services, stable leadership, and reconciliation. The overall political climate is stable but performance sensitive. The government’s credibility in 2025–26 will hinge on visible improvements in access to health care and cost-of-living relief.
In 2026, Manitoba released a renewed five-year poverty reduction strategy, Pathways Forward: Manitoba’s Poverty Reduction Strategy — Heart Medicine for Communities, under the Poverty Reduction Strategy Act, which mandates a renewed strategy every five years. The strategy prioritizes three life-stage groups — children aged zero to five (including the prenatal period), youth exiting the child-welfare system, and seniors — and was informed by more than 3,000 consultations with residents, Indigenous organizations, advocates, service providers, people with lived experience, and business stakeholders. It outlines recommended actions such as increasing Employment and Income Assistance (EIA) earning exemptions, indexing Rent Assist and Manitoba Supports for Persons with Disabilities (MSPD), doubling the prenatal benefit, and legislating universal school nutrition. A whole-of-government approach is embedded through coordinated governance structures, including the Poverty Reduction Committee of Cabinet, a deputy ministers’ table, and an interdepartmental action table.
The strategy has received mixed reviews from community organizations and stakeholders:
- Rural organizations say the strategy does not adequately address the realities of living in rural areas, including access to transportation, housing costs, and reliance on volunteer-led supports.
- Advocacy groups argue the strategy lacks immediate, substantial financial measures — particularly increases to frozen EIA rates — and does not propose broader income support reforms.
- Labour advocates highlight the absence of a commitment to a living wage or a minimum wage tied to the cost of living as a key gap.
- Critics have pointed out that the focus on three life-stage groups excludes other populations — especially working-age adults and school-age children — who also face significant poverty.
Manitoba’s Budget 2026, Good Jobs. Lower Costs. Better Health Care, projects a 2026–27 deficit of $498 million on $26.82 billion in revenue and $27.318 billion in expenses. This marks a notable narrowing from the previous year, driven by a 7.0% revenue increase and improved income for Manitoba Hydro. The net debt-to-GDP ratio is projected at 38.2%, and the government maintains it is on a path to balance by the end of its first term.
Despite measures that were welcomed in Budget 2026, such as new affordability and income support measures, key gaps remain. Budget 2026 does not increase core EIA benefit rates or move beyond the existing CPI-indexed minimum wage formula. Unlike tax credits and brackets, social assistance programs remain unindexed to inflation, even as tax credits and brackets are indexed. Advocacy organizations, including Make Poverty History Manitoba and the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, have consistently called for meaningful increases to the EIA, noting that current rates leave recipients well below the poverty line. Neither the poverty reduction strategy nor the budget includes commitments to raise EIA rates.
Some incremental changes have been made. For example, as of August 2025, the EIA earned income exemption allows recipients to earn up to $500 per month without clawbacks, but there is a 70% clawback on additional earnings. Manitoba’s minimum wage rose modestly to $16.00 from $15.80 per hour in October. The increase reflects inflation but still leaves the minimum wage below widely cited living wage thresholds.
Recent rent regulation reforms strengthen tenant protections and limit excessive increases, building on 2025 legislative changes that restrict large rent increases. While these measures may help moderate housing costs, they do not fully address affordability pressures. Similarly, while the strategy commits to indexing Rent Assist, the indexing will not close the gap between current benefit levels and actual market rents, particularly outside Winnipeg.
Overall, Manitoba’s approach reflects a combination of targeted affordability measures and incremental system improvements, but stops short of structural income reforms.
Policy Recommendations
Affordability
Create a comprehensive, province-wide food-security strategy.
Manitoba should develop and implement a comprehensive food-security strategy to address rising food insecurity and complement its poverty reduction strategy. This work would require full provincial leadership and collaboration with community organizations, Indigenous governments, non-profits, and private sector partners to ensure meaningful, long-term impact.
Enhance and expand rental assistance.
Manitoba’s Rent Assist program provides flexible support in a tight housing market, but benefit levels and eligibility thresholds have not kept pace with rising housing costs. Since 2015, average rents in the province have increased by 20% while Rent Assist eligibility has increased by only 4%. To address this gap, Manitoba should raise all eligibility thresholds by 20%, index them to inflation, and consider increasing the benefit to cover at least 80% of median rent. These changes would ensure that households with low incomes, including people who are working but struggling to make ends meet, can access adequate housing support.
Income Security
Expand earnings exemptions and strengthen the Rewarding Work Allowance.
Under Manitoba’s Employment and Income Assistance (EIA) Program, recipients may exempt the first $200 earned and retain 30% of their earnings beyond that amount — equivalent to a 70% clawback. This structure discourages labour force participation. Increasing the earnings exemption to 55% would allow recipients to retain more of each dollar they earn and strengthen their incentive to work. Additionally, Manitoba should consider increasing the Rewarding Work Allowance by 50%, from $100 to $150 monthly for full time workers and from $50 to $75 for part time workers, to better support individuals who are moving into stable employment.
Labour Market Reform
Develop a youth employment and training strategy to increase youth participation in work and education by 25% by 2030. Manitoba has a relatively high proportion of youth who are not engaged in employment or education, placing many at heightened risk of long-term poverty. The provincial government should establish an expert panel to design a youth employment and training strategy within six months, with legislated objectives incorporated into the broader poverty reduction strategy. The short-term goal should be to increase youth participation in work and education by 25%, supported by targeted investments in training, supports, and pathways to employment.
Addressing Inequities
Strengthen efforts to address food insecurity in northern Manitoba.
Food-insecurity rates in northern Manitoba far exceed national averages. Addressing this will require a comprehensive, multi government approach focused on increasing local food production, improving transportation and storage infrastructure, supporting Indigenous led food sovereignty initiatives, and fostering economic development in northern communities.