Experience of Poverty
|
Experience of Poverty |
||
|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Data | 2026 Grade |
|
People Feeling Worse off Compared to Last Year
This grade is based on the percentage of respondents who indicated they are financially worse-off compared to one year prior. The grade was given a weight of 25/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
42% | C- |
|
People Feeling Worse off Compared to Last Year
This grade is based on the percentage of respondents who indicated they are financially worse-off compared to one year prior. The grade was given a weight of 25/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:42% |
||
2026 GradeC- |
||
|
People Paying More than 30% of Income on Housing
This grade is based on the percentage of respondents who indicated they are spending 30% or more of their income on housing. The grade was given a weight of 25/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
49% | F |
|
People Paying More than 30% of Income on Housing
This grade is based on the percentage of respondents who indicated they are spending 30% or more of their income on housing. The grade was given a weight of 25/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:49% |
||
2026 GradeF |
||
|
People Having Trouble Accessing Healthcare
This grade is based on the percentage of respondents who indicated they 'somewhat disagree’ or ‘strongly disagree’ with the statement ‘I can access and receive healthcare anytime I need to’ AND stated the reason was due to one or more of the following reasons: ‘I can't take time off work’; ‘I don’t have healthcare coverage’; ‘I don’t have money for medication’. The grade was given a weight of 10/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
24% | F |
|
People Having Trouble Accessing Healthcare
This grade is based on the percentage of respondents who indicated they 'somewhat disagree’ or ‘strongly disagree’ with the statement ‘I can access and receive healthcare anytime I need to’ AND stated the reason was due to one or more of the following reasons: ‘I can't take time off work’; ‘I don’t have healthcare coverage’; ‘I don’t have money for medication’. The grade was given a weight of 10/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:24% |
||
2026 GradeF |
||
|
Government Support Recipients Who Say Rates are Insufficient to Keep up with Cost of Living
This grade is based on the percentage of individuals who indicated that they ‘personally receive some form of social security benefit or support’ AND indicated that ‘social assistance rates aren’t high enough to help me keep up with the cost of living’. The grade was given a weight of 25/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
68% | F |
|
Government Support Recipients Who Say Rates are Insufficient to Keep up with Cost of Living
This grade is based on the percentage of individuals who indicated that they ‘personally receive some form of social security benefit or support’ AND indicated that ‘social assistance rates aren’t high enough to help me keep up with the cost of living’. The grade was given a weight of 25/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:68% |
||
2026 GradeF |
||
|
Percent of Income Spent on Fixed Costs beyond Housing
This grade is based on the combination of results from several questions asking the average amount individuals spend on fixed costs like internet, transport, groceries, and utilities. The average amounts spent were converted into a portion of income for those earning $75,000 a year or less (given in a range from lowest to highest). This number is the higher end of the range provided. The grade was given a weight of 15/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
54.9% | C+ |
|
Percent of Income Spent on Fixed Costs beyond Housing
This grade is based on the combination of results from several questions asking the average amount individuals spend on fixed costs like internet, transport, groceries, and utilities. The average amounts spent were converted into a portion of income for those earning $75,000 a year or less (given in a range from lowest to highest). This number is the higher end of the range provided. The grade was given a weight of 15/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:54.9% |
||
2026 GradeC+ |
||
Overall Grade D |
||
Overall Grade: D |
||
British Columbia received a D− grade in 2026, reflecting a persistently weak performance across affordability, access, and income pressure indicators.
- Housing affordability: With 49% of residents spending 30% or more of their income on housing — the highest share in the country — BC received a failing grade for this indicator. Housing stress increased steadily from 2023 to 2026, which indicates worsening affordability over time.
- Income spent on fixed costs outside of housing: BC earned a C+, with people spending 54.9% of their income on fixed costs. This is lower than the national average and slightly lower than in Ontario, but higher than in Quebec. Fixed cost pressure has been consistently high across all years.
- Access to health care: BC received a failing grade for this indicator, with 24% of people reporting difficulty accessing care. Conditions worsened sharply after 2023 and have only partially improved.
- Worse off than last year: The share of residents who feel worse off than they did last year was 42%. Earlier declines suggested hardship was easing slightly, but the 2026 increase signals renewed strain.
- Adequacy of government support: BC received an F for this indicator, with 68% of people who receive government support saying it is inadequate. This is one of the highest rates nationally. The upward trend since 2023 points to growing unmet need.
British Columbia received a D− grade in 2026, reflecting a persistently weak performance across affordability, access, and income pressure indicators.
- Housing affordability: With 49% of residents spending 30% or more of their income on housing — the highest share in the country — BC received a failing grade for this indicator. Housing stress increased steadily from 2023 to 2026, which indicates worsening affordability over time.
- Income spent on fixed costs outside of housing: BC earned a C+, with people spending 54.9% of their income on fixed costs. This is lower than the national average and slightly lower than in Ontario, but higher than in Quebec. Fixed cost pressure has been consistently high across all years.
- Access to health care: BC received a failing grade for this indicator, with 24% of people reporting difficulty accessing care. Conditions worsened sharply after 2023 and have only partially improved.
- Worse off than last year: The share of residents who feel worse off than they did last year was 42%. Earlier declines suggested hardship was easing slightly, but the 2026 increase signals renewed strain.
- Adequacy of government support: BC received an F for this indicator, with 68% of people who receive government support saying it is inadequate. This is one of the highest rates nationally. The upward trend since 2023 points to growing unmet need.
Poverty Measures
|
Poverty Measures |
||
|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Data | 2026 Grade |
|
Poverty Rate (MBM)
The poverty rate (MBM) is based on data from the Statistics Canada 2024 Canadian Income Survey (released in 2026) table showing poverty and low income statistics by selected demographic characteristics. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 40/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
13% | F |
|
Poverty Rate (MBM)
The poverty rate (MBM) is based on data from the Statistics Canada 2024 Canadian Income Survey (released in 2026) table showing poverty and low income statistics by selected demographic characteristics. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 40/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:13% |
||
2026 GradeF |
||
|
Provincial Welfare as a Percent of the Poverty Line (Singles)
This grade is based on the maximum annual provincial welfare income for a single unattached individual considered employable compared to the official poverty line of the provincial capital (the Market Basket Measure). The data is from Welfare in Canada 2025, available on Maytree’s website. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 15/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
46.1% | D |
|
Provincial Welfare as a Percent of the Poverty Line (Singles)
This grade is based on the maximum annual provincial welfare income for a single unattached individual considered employable compared to the official poverty line of the provincial capital (the Market Basket Measure). The data is from Welfare in Canada 2025, available on Maytree’s website. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 15/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:46.1% |
||
2026 GradeD |
||
|
Provincial Disability Welfare as a Percent of the Poverty Line
This grade is based on the maximum annual provincial welfare income for a single unattached individual with a disability compared to the official poverty line of the provincial capital (the Market Basket Measure). The data is from Welfare in Canada 2025, available on Maytree’s website. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 15/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
65.1% | C- |
|
Provincial Disability Welfare as a Percent of the Poverty Line
This grade is based on the maximum annual provincial welfare income for a single unattached individual with a disability compared to the official poverty line of the provincial capital (the Market Basket Measure). The data is from Welfare in Canada 2025, available on Maytree’s website. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 15/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:65.1% |
||
2026 GradeC- |
||
|
Unemployment Rate
This grade is based on Statistics Canada's Labour force characteristics by province, monthly adjusted. This data is from March 2026. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 20/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
6.7% | F |
|
Unemployment Rate
This grade is based on Statistics Canada's Labour force characteristics by province, monthly adjusted. This data is from March 2026. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 20/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:6.7% |
||
2026 GradeF |
||
|
Food Insecurity Rate
This grade is based on the combination of Marginal, Moderate, and Severe food insecurity rates from the Canadian Income Survey (CIS) (released 2026). The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 40/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
23.2% | F |
|
Food Insecurity Rate
This grade is based on the combination of Marginal, Moderate, and Severe food insecurity rates from the Canadian Income Survey (CIS) (released 2026). The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 40/100. Grades were determined using a grade scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:23.2% |
||
2026 GradeF |
||
Overall Grade D- |
||
Overall Grade: D- |
||
British Columbia received an overall grade of D− in the poverty measures section. Quebec received the highest grade (C), while most other provinces received a D− or F, indicating that poverty remains widespread and that progress has been limited across the country.
- Poverty rate: The most recent available data (from 2024) show the poverty rate in BC is 13%, the highest rate among the provinces. Quebec reports the lowest poverty rate among provinces at 7%.
- Social assistance as a percentage of the poverty line: In BC, social assistance provides just 46.1% of the income needed to reach the poverty line. Prince Edward Island performs strongest on this measure among the provinces, with benefits covering 64.4% of the poverty line.
- Disability assistance as a percentage of the poverty line: Disability assistance in BC reaches 65.1% of the poverty line, falling short of what is required. Newfoundland and Labrador provides the most support at 74.1% of the poverty line.
- Unemployment rate: BC's unemployment rate is 6.7%, the same as the national rate. Saskatchewan has the lowest provincial unemployment rate at 5%.
- Food insecurity: The most recent available data (from 2025) show that 23.2% of people in BC live in households experiencing food insecurity. This is slightly below the national average of 24%, yet remains high when compared with Quebec, where approximately 1 in 5 people experience food insecurity.
British Columbia received an overall grade of D− in the poverty measures section. Quebec received the highest grade (C), while most other provinces received a D− or F, indicating that poverty remains widespread and that progress has been limited across the country.
- Poverty rate: The most recent available data (from 2024) show the poverty rate in BC is 13%, the highest rate among the provinces. Quebec reports the lowest poverty rate among provinces at 7%.
- Social assistance as a percentage of the poverty line: In BC, social assistance provides just 46.1% of the income needed to reach the poverty line. Prince Edward Island performs strongest on this measure among the provinces, with benefits covering 64.4% of the poverty line.
- Disability assistance as a percentage of the poverty line: Disability assistance in BC reaches 65.1% of the poverty line, falling short of what is required. Newfoundland and Labrador provides the most support at 74.1% of the poverty line.
- Unemployment rate: BC's unemployment rate is 6.7%, the same as the national rate. Saskatchewan has the lowest provincial unemployment rate at 5%.
- Food insecurity: The most recent available data (from 2025) show that 23.2% of people in BC live in households experiencing food insecurity. This is slightly below the national average of 24%, yet remains high when compared with Quebec, where approximately 1 in 5 people experience food insecurity.
Material Deprivation
|
Material Deprivation |
||
|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Data | 2026 Grade |
|
Inadequate Standard of Living
This grade is based on the % of individuals who were unable to afford 2 or more items from a list of items considered necessary for an adequate standard of living. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 40/100. Grades were determined using a grading scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
30% | C |
|
Inadequate Standard of Living
This grade is based on the % of individuals who were unable to afford 2 or more items from a list of items considered necessary for an adequate standard of living. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 40/100. Grades were determined using a grading scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:30% |
||
2026 GradeC |
||
|
Severely Inadequate Standard of Living
This grade is based on the % of individuals who were unable to afford 3 or more items from a list of items considered necessary for an adequate standard of living. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 60/100. Grades were determined using a grading scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
21% | C |
|
Severely Inadequate Standard of Living
This grade is based on the % of individuals who were unable to afford 3 or more items from a list of items considered necessary for an adequate standard of living. The grade for this indicator was given a weight of 60/100. Grades were determined using a grading scale comparing all provinces (see methodology section for more details). |
||
Data:21% |
||
2026 GradeC |
||
Overall Grade C |
||
Overall Grade: C |
||
British Columbia received a C grade for material deprivation in 2026, placing it in the middle of all the provinces on this indicator.
This grade represents a decline from the B it received in 2025 and contrasts with the national trend of overall improvement.
Material deprivation remains widespread in the province: 21% of residents are severely deprived, lacking several basic items, and 30% experience inadequate living standards. After falling sharply between 2024 and 2025, both forms of deprivation increased in 2026.
The rise in moderate deprivation is particularly notable, suggesting that while the rate of the most severe hardship is lower than in earlier years, more households are experiencing moderate deprivation. This pattern aligns with BC’s worsening results on housing affordability and income pressure indicators.
Overall, BC's material deprivation results suggest that earlier improvements have stalled, leaving a significant share of residents unable to afford a basic standard of living in 2026.
British Columbia received a C grade for material deprivation in 2026, placing it in the middle of all the provinces on this indicator.
This grade represents a decline from the B it received in 2025 and contrasts with the national trend of overall improvement.
Material deprivation remains widespread in the province: 21% of residents are severely deprived, lacking several basic items, and 30% experience inadequate living standards. After falling sharply between 2024 and 2025, both forms of deprivation increased in 2026.
The rise in moderate deprivation is particularly notable, suggesting that while the rate of the most severe hardship is lower than in earlier years, more households are experiencing moderate deprivation. This pattern aligns with BC’s worsening results on housing affordability and income pressure indicators.
Overall, BC's material deprivation results suggest that earlier improvements have stalled, leaving a significant share of residents unable to afford a basic standard of living in 2026.
Legislative Progress
|
Legislative Progress |
||
|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Data | 2026 Grade |
|
Legislative Progress
|
D |
|
|
Legislative Progress
|
||
Data: |
||
2026 GradeD |
||
Overall Grade D |
||
Overall Grade: D |
||
Housing and Affordability
- Passed the Housing Statutes Amendment Act, 2024, to accelerate housing supply, including measures to restrict local zoning barriers, increase density, and amend regulation to better enable the addition of secondary suites.
- Continued the Speculation and Vacancy Tax to discourage people from leaving properties unoccupied and increase housing availability.
Income Security
- Amended social assistance regulations so that if both members of a couple receive disability assistance, they each receive the same support allowance as a single person. However, social assistance rates have not increased since 2023 and rates are not indexed to inflation.
- Committed $121 million over three years in Budget 2026 to income, disability, and supplementary assistance.
- Raised the annual earnings exemption for families with one person on disability assistance from $19,440 to $23,400.
- Continued the implementation of the 10-year poverty reduction strategy, with targets to reduce overall poverty by 60% and child poverty by 75% by 2034.
Labour Market Supports
- Launched a $70.4 million retraining fund for workers affected by tariffs in key sectors, including softwood lumber and steel.
- Partnered with the Federal Government to invest over $ 6 million in targeted training programs for people who are facing barriers to employment. These included programs in construction, health care, hospitality, education support, and skilled trades across multiple regions.
BC received a D for legislative progress this year. The province has continued to advance structural housing reforms, including measures to increase density and strengthen renter protections, and made targeted adjustments to income supports, such as raising the annual earnings exemption and effectively increasing payments for couples on disability assistance. However, these changes are incremental. Social assistance rates have not increased since 2023 and remain unindexed to inflation, so their value has eroded over time.
Despite maintaining its ambitious poverty reduction strategy, it adapted few new actions to support its targets. Budget 2026 included no significant new investments, and the Government did not follow through on its commitment to introduce a groceries benefit. With fiscal constraints limiting new spending, current measures are unlikely to meaningfully reduce poverty.
Housing and Affordability
- Passed the Housing Statutes Amendment Act, 2024, to accelerate housing supply, including measures to restrict local zoning barriers, increase density, and amend regulation to better enable the addition of secondary suites.
- Continued the Speculation and Vacancy Tax to discourage people from leaving properties unoccupied and increase housing availability.
Income Security
- Amended social assistance regulations so that if both members of a couple receive disability assistance, they each receive the same support allowance as a single person. However, social assistance rates have not increased since 2023 and rates are not indexed to inflation.
- Committed $121 million over three years in Budget 2026 to income, disability, and supplementary assistance.
- Raised the annual earnings exemption for families with one person on disability assistance from $19,440 to $23,400.
- Continued the implementation of the 10-year poverty reduction strategy, with targets to reduce overall poverty by 60% and child poverty by 75% by 2034.
Labour Market Supports
- Launched a $70.4 million retraining fund for workers affected by tariffs in key sectors, including softwood lumber and steel.
- Partnered with the Federal Government to invest over $ 6 million in targeted training programs for people who are facing barriers to employment. These included programs in construction, health care, hospitality, education support, and skilled trades across multiple regions.
BC received a D for legislative progress this year. The province has continued to advance structural housing reforms, including measures to increase density and strengthen renter protections, and made targeted adjustments to income supports, such as raising the annual earnings exemption and effectively increasing payments for couples on disability assistance. However, these changes are incremental. Social assistance rates have not increased since 2023 and remain unindexed to inflation, so their value has eroded over time.
Despite maintaining its ambitious poverty reduction strategy, it adapted few new actions to support its targets. Budget 2026 included no significant new investments, and the Government did not follow through on its commitment to introduce a groceries benefit. With fiscal constraints limiting new spending, current measures are unlikely to meaningfully reduce poverty.
Political And Policy Landscape
During the most recent 2024 provincial election, the BC NDP narrowly won a second consecutive majority, but with fewer seats.
The Provincial government has ambitious poverty reduction targets. Its 2024 Poverty Reduction Strategy states that it aims to reduce overall poverty by 60%, child poverty by 75%, and senior poverty by 50%.
However, spending on health care and education over past years has led to concern about BC’s fiscal position. RBC noted that the province has large deficits, an increasing debt-to-GDP ratio, and no path to balance. Two major rating agencies downgraded BC’s credit rating after the 2025 Budget.
The latest budget included no significant new spending announcements despite new tax increases but referenced aims to cut 15,000 public service jobs and freeze the number of new providers for its $10/day childcare program. Several 2024 campaign commitments have apparently gone by the wayside.
Shannon Salter, Deputy Minister to the Premier, David Eby, described the current fiscal trajectory as “unsustainable.”
The Eby administration has not honoured its campaign commitment to introduce a groceries benefit. It previously described this proposed benefit as “an immediate $1,000 cheque for most families to help address cost-of-living challenges, specifically the cost of groceries. After the first year, the rebate would have become an income tax cut.”
Neither has it honoured its commitment to increase income, disability, and supplementary assistance spending. Budget 2026 adds only $121 million over three years — which translates to a negligible increase — rather than the $3 billion over three years mentioned previously.
Premier Eby defended the changes by pointing to a more challenging economic outlook because of the U.S. tariffs and associated uncertainty. However, critics say the government should have responded to low economic growth projections prior to the introduction of tariffs by establishing a sustainable fiscal position from the outset of its tenure.
Policy Recommendations
Affordability
Fulfill the BC NDP’s commitment to introduce a groceries rebate.
The BC NDP’s primary campaign commitment was a “grocery rebate”—an immediate $1,000 payment for most families (or $500 for most individuals) to help address cost-of-living pressures, particularly rising food costs. After the first year, the rebate would transition into an income tax reduction. Implementing this commitment would provide timely relief to households struggling to cope with rising grocery prices.
Maintain BC Housing’s capital budget at a minimum of $1.2 billion per year.
While BC has increased investments in affordable housing, a significant share has gone toward subsidies and operating funding rather than capital construction. With housing construction lagging behind population growth, the province cannot afford to reduce its investment in new builds. Food Banks Canada recommends maintaining a capital plan of at least $1.2 billion per year, indexed to inflation, through 2030. This level of investment would support the construction of approximately 750 additional units annually.
Income Security
Restore BC's social assistance commitment: index all benefits and increase rates for single adults.
Budget 2026 includes $121 million over three years for income, disability, and supplementary assistance – far below the previously announced $3 billion commitment. The province should restore this investment level, beginning with immediate CPI indexation for all benefit rates. Single adults, who represent a high proportion of people living in poverty, have been largely overlooked by poverty reduction efforts focused on children and families. The province should provide a targeted rate increase of at least 10% for single individuals to prevent further erosion of benefit adequacy and align with broader poverty reduction goals.
Labour Market Reform
Reduce clawbacks for workers who have low incomes and introduce a provincial earnings supplement.
Despite recent increases to earnings exemptions for people who receive income assistance, workers with low incomes continue to face high clawback rates. BC should analyze the feasibility of creating a provincial earnings supplement modelled on Ontario’s Low-Income Individuals and Families Tax Credit (LIFT) or the federal Canada Workers Benefit (CWB), both of which support workers with low incomes and strengthen work incentives.
Addressing Inequities
Ensure that BC is on track to meet the Poverty Reduction Strategy targets.
The province is in the third year of its 2024 Poverty Reduction Strategy, which aims for a 60% reduction in overall poverty and a 75% reduction in child poverty by 2034. Annual progress reports are needed to help provide ongoing accountability for the plan, and the government should move to adopt interim targets to help better measure progress over the decade.