INC
Northwest Territories Report Card
Section 1: Experience of Poverty |
|||
---|---|---|---|
Indicator | Data | 2024 Grade |
2023 Grade |
People Feeling Worse off Compared to Last Year
|
23.4% | INC |
A |
People Spending More than 30% of Income on Housing
|
67% | INC |
F |
People Having Trouble Accessing Health Care
|
0% | INC |
B- |
Government Support Recipients Who Say Rates Are Insufficient to Keep Up with Cost of Living
|
33.3% | INC |
C+ |
Percent of Income Spent on Fixed Costs beyond Housing
|
42.8% | INC |
A+ |
Overall | INC |
INC |
|
Section 2: Poverty Measures |
|||
Indicator | Data | 2024 Grade |
2023 Grade |
Poverty Rate (MBM)
|
10.2% | INC |
F |
Provincial Welfare as a percentage of the poverty line (Singles)
|
112% | INC |
|
Provincial Welfare as a percentage of the poverty line
|
93% | INC |
|
Unemployment Rate
|
5.2% | D+ |
D+ |
Food Insecurity Rate
|
20.4% | INC |
D |
Overall | INC |
C- |
|
Section 3: Material Deprivation |
|||
Indicator | Data | Grade |
|
Inadequate Standard of Living
|
11.7% | INC |
|
Severely Inadequate Standard of Living
|
7.4% | INC |
|
Overall | INC |
||
Section 4: Legislative Progress |
|||
Indicator | Data | 2024 Grade |
2023 Grade |
Legislative Progress
|
F |
B |
|
Overall | F |
B |
|
The Northwest Territories faces deep poverty challenges, including high rates of food insecurity and poverty, as well as steep costs for housing and other essentials. These factors are made worse by limited finances and the enduring impact of colonialism. Compared to other territories the NWT government has largely neglected to address these issues in 2024. While there were efforts in 2023, such as raising the minimum wage and modernizing social assistance, progress on poverty reduction initiatives has stalled this in 2024.
Poverty Overview
According to the Northern-specific market basket measure
(MBM) used in the 2021 census, approximately 1 in 10 residents (11.1 per cent)
in the NWT experience poverty. While poverty in the NWT is significantly lower
than in neighbouring Nunavut, it is still high compared to both the national
average and the Yukon’s rate. Population growth has recently stagnated,
as it has in all the territories, but the NWT has significant
resource wealth and development potential that present major future
opportunities for prosperity and equitable growth if properly tapped.
Overall, residents of the NWT identify improving
infrastructure, reducing taxes for people with low incomes and for small
businesses, promoting decent work, and reducing food costs as top priorities in
the alleviation of poverty.
Children and youth, as a combined group, represented over
one-third of the NWT’s population in the 2016 and 2021 censuses. Children (under
18) represented 25 per cent of the population and youth (aged 18–24)
represented 9 per cent. This breakdown of age groups is found in many
Indigenous communities across Northern Canada. Young people are a significant
demographic, particularly in Nunavut, where they make up half the population.
Child poverty in the NWT is significantly higher than in the Yukon (14.5 per
cent compared to 8.9 per cent) but much lower than in Nunavut (43.5 per cent).
With children making up such a large proportion of the population, the high
child poverty rate is all the more concerning.
Conversely, people in their core working years have the
lowest poverty rate among all age groups in the NWT, at 9.1 per cent among
those aged 25–54. In particular, those who are coupled - and can therefore
spread their costs over two incomes, experience poverty at a much lower rate
(5.1 per cent).
Comparison with Other Territories
The poverty rates among families and individuals differ
greatly among the three territories. For example, in the Yukon, the overall
poverty rates are similar for both people who live alone and people who live as
a couple. One exception to this is the rate of poverty among lone parents who
are women. The poverty rate for this group in the Yukon is slightly below the
rate for Canada as a whole. In the NWT, however, couples, single mothers, and
people who live alone had slightly higher poverty rates than the national
rates. In Nunavut, poverty rates were higher in nearly every demographic group
compared to the Canadian average, with significantly higher rates among single
parents and people who live alone. A majority of single parents in Nunavut live
in poverty, which is nearly four times higher than the Yukon (14 per cent) and
far outpaces rates seen anywhere in Canada.
Table 1. Poverty rate for select groups by Canada and the
territories (per cent), 2021 census[1]
Select groups |
Canada |
Yukon |
NWT |
Nunavut |
All residents |
8.1 |
8.6 |
11.1 |
34.9 |
Couples with children |
4 |
3.7 |
6.6 |
31 |
Couples without children |
3.9 |
4 |
5 |
9.5 |
Single parents |
14.1 |
14 |
22.4 |
54.7 |
Single mothers |
19.7 |
14.2 |
23.1 |
55.4 |
Single people without children |
21.5 |
20.7 |
22.1 |
39.3 |
Poverty and Inequality in Northwest Territories
Unfortunately, the small sample sizes mean that Statistics
Canada does not report poverty rates that allow for disaggregated analysis in
the territories by Indigenous or racial identity, or by immigration status.
However, knowing that people who identify with these demographics generally
experience higher rates of poverty across Canada—as seen, for example, in the
data for the provinces—we can assume that the NWT is similar and that it must
provide additional support for groups that have a disproportionate experience
of poverty.
About half
of the NWT’s population identifies as Indigenous. This is the
second-highest proportion in Canada, trailing only Nunavut, where the majority
of residents are Inuit. Among Indigenous Peoples in the NWT, two-thirds are
First Nations, over 20 per cent are Inuit, and the rest are Métis. While
poverty rates among Indigenous people in the NWT are difficult to determine,
our national survey revealed that providing regular and reliable supports to
Indigenous communities is an important poverty-reduction strategy to 89 per
cent of people in the territory. This rate is nearly 20 percentage points
higher than the national average and indicates an acute need among the
Indigenous population.
In the NWT, nearly 5,000 individuals (12.2 per cent of the
population) self-identified as belonging to the racialized population. In
addition, 70 per cent of racialized individuals were first-generation
immigrants (born outside of Canada). Overall, the NWT has one of the highest
rates of people who say that tackling racialized and ethnic inequality is important
to reducing poverty—85 per cent, compared to 71 per cent nationally.
Labour and Education
As of
March 2024, the unemployment rate in the NWT is 5 per cent, which is similar to
a year ago (5.2 per cent). Furthermore, as of January 2024, the percentage of
people who are participating in the workforce is significantly higher in the
NWT (72 per cent) than the national rate (65.4 per cent) and much higher than
in neighbouring Nunavut (60.2 per cent).
Youth aged 15–29 who are not in employment, education, or
training (NEET) are at particular risk of poverty. In 2022, 20 per cent of
youth in the NWT were in this situation, which is nearly double the rate for
youth in Canada as a whole. In addition, one-quarter of NWT adults (aged 25–64)
did not have a high school diploma or equivalent. This is double the rate for
this group in Canada as a whole (11.6 per cent), and it is even higher among
NWT men (29 per cent).
A particular challenge for the NWT’s labour market is poor
Internet access, which hinders access to remote work. A significant majority of
the population (85 per cent) agree that Internet access is important to
reducing poverty, compared to 72 per cent nationally. Without access to
high-speed Internet, people living in the NWT may struggle to access economic
opportunities elsewhere in the country. This type of access is vital in small
communities where employment opportunities can be limited.
For people who are unable to find work, social assistance
rates are not enough to help them make ends meet. Almost half of the population
(49 per cent) think it is really important to see an increase in last-resort
benefits. This figure is nearly 15 percentage points higher than the national
average.
The Cost of Living and Affordable Housing
As with other variables, data is not readily or consistently
available at the territorial level to allow for a robust assessment of certain
essentials such as food and shelter. The following is a short summary of what
we do know.
Between December 2022 and December 2023, the overall price
of goods and services in Yellowknife increased by 3 per cent, which was
slightly slower than in Canada as a whole (3.4 per cent), according to the
Consumer Price Index.
Yellowknife, at 7.7 per cent, had the highest increase in
food costs in Canada. In addition, the cost of food in Northern communities
remains significantly higher than in the rest of Canada because of the overall
higher costs of living in remote and isolated areas, coupled with the high
costs of shipping and storing perishable and nutritious food. Overall food
insecurity in the NWT remains high. One particular aspect of the experience of
food insecurity in the territories is the need to access traditional foods. In
the NWT, 84 per cent of people say that increasing access to traditional foods
is important to them.
Furthermore, the cost of shelter increased by 5 per cent in Yellowknife, which is slightly lower than the increase in shelter costs in Canada as a whole (6 per cent). As with Nunavut, the primary housing problem in the NWT is twofold: a lack of suitable housing and housing that is too expensive. Approximately 13 per cent of households in the NWT were considered in core housing need in 2021, and the proportion of those who find themselves in this situation because the housing structure is inadequate as opposed to unaffordable is deeply concerning. It is therefore unsurprising that 94 per cent of people in the NWT say that improving infrastructure in their communities is important to them. Despite the known issue of inadequate housing in the territory, 2 in 3 residents (the highest rate in the country) report spending 30 per cent or more of their income on housing.
[1] Note that the Canada-wide rate reports poverty on the basis of the national MBM, while the results for the territories use the Northern-specific MBM (MBM-N). If the MBM-N were applied as a concept to the rest of Canada, overall rates of poverty nationally would be higher because of the higher level of income that is assumed to be needed to pay for certain essentials.
Rather than presenting a full annual budget this year, the NWT government instead tabled an interim budget that covered the year’s first quarter to give the Legislative Assembly additional time to complete its transition and set priorities.
As noted above, housing and food costs remain two of the
most prevalent public policy challenges facing the territory. Compared to
Nunavut, which has developed a long-term plan to replenish its housing stock
with as many as 3,000 units by the close of the decade, progress in the NWT has
been slow and less strategic. One
hundred new units are currently being built, but this is the first
expansion of public housing in decades.
As with Nunavut and the Yukon, the NWT
does not have rent control and there is no cap on annual allowable rent
increases, although renters are protected from eviction for a certain period.
The Yukon is in the process of ending no-fault eviction and undertaking a
comprehensive review of tenant protections. The NWT should consider adopting
its own comprehensive policy framework to protect renters. This must be paired
with a significant emphasis on how to replenish, renew, and expand affordable
housing, particularly in the rental market.
Although the NWT has significant economic potential, its
short- to medium-term outlook is not bright. Economic growth is stagnating and
several key industries—in particular, diamond mines—are
maturing and may soon reduce or close production. The NWT has benefited
traditionally from high employment and wage growth, but it has limited sources
of new investment. This is compounded by a commitment
by the Premier to reduce spending, indicating that the government is
prioritizing improving fiscal sustainability rather than making significant new
investments in infrastructure capacity or future economic development.
While resource projects often experience cycles of boom and
bust, they are important anchor institutions that can boost local economic
activity and provide well-paying jobs for residents who might otherwise be at
risk of falling into poverty. There is an urgent need for the territorial and
federal governments to work together to promote coordinated long-term
investments in strategic industries that will help unlock new opportunities and
growth, both public and private.
As previously noted, the NWT, like the other territories, is
experiencing critical housing, broadband, and local food production gaps. These
gaps have not been meaningfully addressed in the last year, with the exception
of the housing gap—$4.3
billion in additional federal support was committed to urban, rural, and
northern priorities for Indigenous housing providers. A portion of this funding
is likely to support new investment in the NWT, although the exact figure has
yet to be announced.
The precarity of broadband access was underscored earlier
this year when many NWT communities, including nearly all of Yellowknife, lost
Internet access for hours after Northwestel’s fibre-optic links were severed.
Although satellite service was uninterrupted, the incident underscored the
critical need to close the gap in access to high-speed Internet across the
territory, where the proportion of residents without such services is more
than five times the national average.
In last year’s report we recommended the territory increase its minimum wage. This was partly fulfilled last fall, when the NWT announced its first minimum wage hike in years, from $15.20 per hour to $16.05 per hour. However, this is still significantly less generous than its neighbours’ minimum wages. The minimum wage is $17.59 in the Yukon and $17.59 in Nunavut.
In terms of the adequacy of income support, the NWT has one of the most generous welfare programs in the North. Although the territory has indicated a desire to limit spending in the near future, the 2024 interim budget includes a commitment to a one-time top-up to income assistance in light of ongoing inflation and affordability concerns. This will provide between $350 and about $720 in additional assistance this year, primarily to help with high food costs.
Decent Work that Pays
1. Raise the minimum wage to at least match Yukon's minimum wage, then index it going forward.The NWT’s minimum wage was recently increased to $16.05, the first increase in more than two years. While this helps to offset some of the recent inflation pressures, there is a need to provide greater support, particularly as affordability concerns remain high.
2. Review community benefits associated with major infrastructure and mining projects.With the resurgence of global commodity prices and the increased interest in Canadian mining, along with new investments in northern defence infrastructure, the NWT is well positioned to be a key partner in these sectors. It is important that all residents benefit equitably from these projects. We recommend the territory increase its focus on securing jobs, long-term training, apprenticeships, and community benefit investments that will all help to provide greater employment and economic opportunities for residents with low incomes.
Cost of Living
3. Enhance Income Assistance, the NWT Child Benefit, and all other benefits payments by 15 per cent over the next three years, then index them to inflation moving forward.Affordable Housing
4. Adopt meaningful rent controlGiven the broad introduction of the Canada–NWT Housing Benefit rent supplement program, which to date has no active waiting list, there is an opportunity for the territory to take further steps to protect renters.
5. Develop a formal municipal matching fund for rental constructionUsing Yukon’s successful municipal rental construction fund as a model, the NWT should investigate the creation of a municipal/territorial grant matching model to assist developers of purpose-built rental construction. This can be developed with a small pool of capital funding to begin with, and scaled over time as dedicated funding is established.
Community Infrastructure
6. Work in partnership with the federal government to reduce the gaps in housing, broadband, and local food production.The territorial government should collaborate with the Government of Canada to develop a long-term capital plan that aims to reduce the gaps between the NWT and the provinces. As part of the NWT’s focus on housing, both the territory and the federal government should take inspiration from Nunavut’s recent plan to build up to 3,000 units of housing by the end of 2030.
7. Vision for economic growth and prosperity.With many major employers, including several large diamond mines, nearing the end of their production cycle, the territory and the federal government must work together to develop a long-term, comprehensive plan for economic growth that will ensure good jobs for low- and mid-skilled workers. At the core of this plan must be a commitment to develop a social and community infrastructure that will enable effective long-term development.
POVERTY REPORT CARDS
- Hover on the provinces/territories to see an overview of each province/territory’s grades
- Click on the provinces/territories to expand and view Poverty Report Card overview
- For more detailed information about the Overall Grade, Context, Political and Policy Landscape, Looking Ahead and Policy Recommendation: click View Report Card
These grades represent how well poverty reduction efforts are going in the provincial, territorial, and federal governments. As poverty is the result of many factors, including the cost of housing and everyday needs, to the quality of the social safety net, these Report Cards explore the experience of poverty across Canada and where governments can take steps to improve their social policy.
Provinces and territories are graded based on how they compare with each other on experiences of poverty, measurements of poverty, a standard of living, and government progress on passing anti-poverty legislation. This helps policymakers and advocates compare how governments are doing, see what policies are working well across the country, and have evidence at hand to advocate for effective policies that tackle poverty.
This is a living tool and will be updated annually to track how much progress governments are making in reducing poverty.
A
B
C
D
F
INC
Inconclusive
As an organization that supports a network of associations spanning from coast to coast to coast, Food Banks Canada recognizes that our work takes place on the traditional territories of Indigenous Peoples who have cared for this land that we now call Canada since time immemorial.
We acknowledge that many of us are settlers and these lands that we live, work, meet, and travel on are subject to First Nations self-government under modern treaties, unceded and un-surrendered territories, or traditional territories from which First Nations Peoples, Métis, and Inuit have been displaced.
We are committed to decolonization and to dismantling the systems of oppression that have and continue to dispossess Indigenous people of their lands and deny them their inherent rights to self-determination. This includes evaluating the role that Food Banks Canada has played in perpetuating these systems and working toward being active partners in the path toward reconciliation.
Authors:
Philippe Ozga , Chief Network and Government Relations Officer
Isaac Smith, Manager of Policy and Government Relations
Dana Vreeswijk, Policy and Advocacy Officer
EDI Analysis done by Empowered EDI:
Design done by:
IdeaNotion – Web
Igniter – Copy