Across Northern Canada, territorial governments provide basic social assistance services that reflect the high costs of living in the Canadian territories. The economies of Nunavut, Yukon, and the Northwest Territories depend heavily on transfers from the Government of Canada. In Nunavut, these transfers represent roughly 90% of the territory’s total budget. The levels of basic social assistance vary significantly from territory to territory. The basic amount in 2020 was highest in the Northwest Territories ($26,211 for a single adult considered employable) and lowest in Nunavut ($9,228 for a single adult considered employable). In every case, this basic assistance in the territories is boosted by various federal and provincial benefits and additional social assistance payments. People in the territories who receive social assistance also receive federal tax credits and—in the case of Yukon and the Northwest Territories—territorial tax credits.

Food Insecurity

The high price of food and insufficient access (in particular, to fresh nourishing food) has resulted in massive food insecurity across Northern Canada. The cost to feed a family in the territories far exceeds that of any of the provinces in southern Canada because of the costs of shipping, refrigeration, and other inputs that have only worsened with recent inflation.

Indigenous peoples in the North are acutely impacted by food insecurity. In 2012, the UN Special Rapporteur on the right to food reported that Nunavut’s Inuit population had “the highest documented food insecurity rate for any Aboriginal population in a developed country.”

The same report noted that the rate of food insecurity for Inuit adults was six times higher than the national average. Since 2020, the federal government has invested over $1.1 million to improve food insecurity in Nunavut, with organizations including Food Banks Canada acting as partners to distribute this funding.

Food in the North

Food insecurity is a major concern across Northern Canada. Rates of food insecurity are well above the national figure of 18%: Yukon, 21%; the Northwest Territories, 20%; and Nunavut, 50%. Our 2023 survey revealed that 40% of people in the North struggle to access fresh and affordable food. Unfortunately, the limitations of data collection may mean that the true figures are much higher.

It is well known that the cost of food in the northern and remote parts of Canada are vastly different than in the rest of the country, where a family can spend roughly $400–$500 a week on food.

Unaffordable and Inadequate Housing

Housing costs are also a major concern, although situations differ across the region. Over half of the survey respondents indicated that they are spending more than 30% of their income on rent. With residents on low incomes responding that they spend an average of 50% of their income on other fixed costs, we gather that most Northern residents spend close to or more than 100% of their income on meeting their basic needs.

The Challenges of Finding Work

In addition, the lack of economic diversity and reliance on resource extraction industries like mining and oil and gas contribute to limited employment opportunities in the North. Unemployment in Nunavut, for example, is 12%.

The North also has higher rates of substance abuse and mental health issues than the national average, which can lead to poverty as people struggle to maintain their employment and relationships. In fact, almost half of the respondents in the territories indicated that their mental health was impacting their ability to find work, work effectively, or maintain their finances.

Last-Resort Systems Still Not Enough

As more people in the North struggle, more are forced to rely on social supports. The proportion of EI recipients is 20% higher than the national average, and overall, at least 30% of the population in the North is receiving some kind of social support (12% higher than the national average). Unfortunately, as in much of the rest of the country, social assistance rates are not high enough to make a real difference. Nearly 2 in 5 recipients state that support amounts are not high enough to keep up with the cost of living. Many residents also struggle to navigate the tax system, which means there is likely a smaller uptake of much-needed benefits.

Every government in the North has introduced a formal poverty reduction plan, with updates due in the coming years. Governments have prioritized tackling food insecurity, housing, and the high cost of living through various pieces of legislation and budgetary items. Legislation and policy plans introduced by each territory over the last few years are listed below:

Yukon:

• Better Yukon for All: Government of Yukon’s Social Inclusion and Poverty Reduction Strategy (2012)
  • The Government of Yukon introduced a poverty reduction strategy that builds on the findings from various consultations and studies
• Food Security in Yukon: A Snapshot
  • In November 2020, this report was released by the Yukon Energy Food Security Network. It was intended to capture perspectives on food security in Yukon and its impact on community members.
  • In addition to long-term structural issues related to housing or transportation, the report highlights the unique challenges to Northern food security brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Northwest Territories

• Working Together II: An Action Plan to Reduce Poverty in the Northwest Territories (2019)
  • Following on the 2015 plan, the Government of the Northwest Territories updated its poverty reduction plan in 2019.
• NWT Housing Action Plan (2020)
  • In March 2020, the Government of the Northwest Territories released a three-year plan to address housing accessibility and adequacy.
  • The plan pledged:
    • $2.3 million toward maintaining/increasing social housing supply (224 units),
    • $14.5 million toward repairing and replacing existing social housing stock (168 units), and
    • $8.2 million toward supporting homeownership repair programs (162 units).

Nunavut

• Collaboration for Poverty Reduction Act (2013)
  • In May 2013, the Government of Nunavut passed legislation mandating partnerships with Inuit, non-profit, government, and business organizations on the Nunavut Roundtable for Poverty Reduction.
  • The act essentially legislates the implementation of the Makimaniq Plan and the five-year poverty reduction action plan.
• The Makimaniq Plan 2: A Shared Approach to Poverty Reduction (2017)
  • Building on the foundation of the original plan laid out in 2011, this plan introduces the work of the Nunavut Roundtable for Poverty Reduction and lays out the eight long-term objectives of the territory’s poverty reduction work.
  • The document also includes a data collection plan and proposed indicators of progress to measure the plan’s impact.

Colonialism and Systemic Discrimination

Canadian colonialism and systemic discrimination have played significant roles in perpetuating poverty in the territories. The history of colonialism in Canada involved the displacement, marginalization, and cultural assimilation of Indigenous peoples, leading to the erosion of their traditional ways of life and economic systems. This disruption has resulted in limited access to resources, land, and opportunities for Indigenous communities in the territories.

Moreover, systemic discrimination in areas such as education, health care, employment, and infrastructure development has further deepened the socio-economic disparities. Discriminatory policies, such as the Indian Act, have restricted Indigenous self-governance and economic autonomy, hindering the ability of Indigenous peoples to address poverty effectively.

The remote and isolated nature of many Northern communities exacerbates the challenges, with limited access to essential services and high costs of living. Addressing poverty in the territories requires acknowledging and rectifying the historical injustices and systemic barriers that continue to hinder Indigenous communities’ socio-economic progress.

Cost of Living

1. Create an energy subsidy for households living on low incomes

The Senior Fuel Subsidy was created to help seniors offset the high cost of heating fuel in Nunavut. Although the territory provides an offset for carbon pricing, there is no broad-based support available to help residents under the age of 60 with the costs of heating their homes. These costs are already high, even before factoring in carbon pricing. Nunavut provides a subsidy to reduce electricity costs, but they are still about four times more expensive than in Ontario. The territorial government should develop a program, similar to the Senior Fuel Subsidy, that is specifically designed to help low- and modest-income households with the affordability challenges of energy consumption.

2. Increase and index the child benefit

While the Nunavut Child Benefit (NUCB) provides much-needed support to families, it is not indexed, and so its value in real terms has declined throughout the years. Nunavut should follow in Yukon’s footsteps and index the NUCB and allocate further funding to increase it to offset recent inflation.

Community Infrastructure

3. Direct Qullic Energy Corporation to establish a timeline for cleaner, affordable power alternatives

Building on the momentum of renewable energy deployment in Yukon and the NWT, the territorial government, as a shareholder of Quillic Energy Corporation, needs to be more forceful in establishing a binding and clear pathway for the broad-scale deployment of affordable clean energy at both the household and institutional levels. While this will require the support of the federal government to assist with some portion of the required capital subsidy, the territorial utility requires both a plan and the framework and infrastructure to make it happen when federal support is available. This plan must include a target for territory-wide access to net metering, the development of battery storage areas, and a mix of less costly and lower-emission sources.

4. Vision to address critical infrastructure gaps in affordable housing, clean energy, food production, and broadband

Given the significant infrastructure gaps in affordable housing, clean energy, food production, and broadband—combined with Nunavut’s limited fiscal resources—it is clear that the territory will need coordinated federal support to make meaningful progress on these various priorities. However, to do so, the territory, in concert with Inuit and Indigenous partners, must develop a comprehensive, long-term infrastructure plan with a set of actionable initiatives, and a delivery plan that includes clear timelines and prioritization mechanisms in approvals, that can be stood up if funded. This infrastructure plan should be based on the goal of bringing the infrastructure for each of these areas up to the national standard within the next decade, not only in Nunavut but ideally as part of a coordinated plan across all the territories.